>>Are they loaded into a specific subpool defined by MVS, or the
>>loading piece of software responsible to do an appropriate
>>STORAGE OBTAIN before using that internal interface?
>
>
>Both are possible. The default system processing happens to use subpool 1
>(but the subpool number is not to be
Are they loaded into a specific subpool defined by MVS, or the
loading piece of software responsible to do an appropriate
STORAGE OBTAIN before using that internal interface?
Both are possible. The default system processing happens to use subpool 1
(but the subpool number is not to be
] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 6:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: How are Program Object sections with Defer attribute
loaded?
It appears to me that deferred-load sections are merely an enhanced external
dummy section (aka pseudo-register
It appears to me that deferred-load sections are merely an enhanced
external dummy section (aka pseudo-register) facility. The binder updates
Q-cons for them, and it's up to the program to implement the actual
in-memory version, and provide a method for finding it. LE and its HLL
ancestors have
>>How does one request that "deferred load" section be
>>loaded now?
>"One" does not. LE does, using an internal interface. LE is responsible
for making sure that both the "immediate load" and "deferred load"
sections are in place.
I understand LE is using it, but since "deferred load" is
>How does one request that "deferred load" section be
>loaded now?
"One" does not. LE does, using an internal interface. LE is responsible
for making sure that both the "immediate load" and "deferred load"
sections are in place.
As to finding it in a dump, perhaps that would be based on
[Default] On 10 May 2017 11:09:25 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
p...@gmx.ch (Peter Hunkeler) wrote:
>
>
>
>>> How does one request that "deferred load" section be loaded now? I probably
>>> was looking for the wrong thing at the wrong place, since I could not find
>>> it.
>>>
>> I believe
>That's actually a trickier question than you might imagine!
I imagine it is! In my current job, I'm getting involved when standard
application debugging techniques don't help anymore. I usually work with IPCS,
so SYSMDUMPs and SVCDUMPs. We moved to Cobol V5.2 earlier this year, but I
still
> Trust in the COBOL young Luke.. You do not need to understand the COBOL, It
knows what you need.
LOL ! Thanks for amusing me after a long day.
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
>> How does one request that "deferred load" section be loaded now? I probably
>> was looking for the wrong thing at the wrong place, since I could not find
>> it.
>>
> I believe they're loaded on demand. If you need them, they' re there;
if they're not there, you didn't need them.
This
That's actually a trickier question than you might imagine! There are a number
of cases: the case where your module consists of COBOL, PL/I and assembler
only and all other cases. All other cases include cases where the COBOL run
time support is implemented in a language other than the
On Wed, 10 May 2017 19:02:32 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>I understand that Cobol V5 and newer is marking the Working Storage sections
>(C_WSA) with the "deferred load" attribute. I further understand that
>"deferred load" sections are not loaded automatically when the load module is
>brought
to:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:03 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: How are Program Object sections with Defer attribute loaded?
>
> I understand that Cobol V5 and newer is marking the Working S
I understand that Cobol V5 and newer is marking the Working Storage sections
(C_WSA) with the "deferred load" attribute. I further understand that "deferred
load" sections are not loaded automatically when the load module is brought
into storage.
How does one request that "deferred load"
14 matches
Mail list logo
