On Thu, 4 May 2017 07:44:48 -0500, Bruce Wells wrote:
>On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:38:23 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>It should improve in z/OS 2.3:
>>
>> http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/5/897/ENUS217-085/index.html&request_locale=en
I will definitely like
On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:38:23 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Wed, 3 May 2017 04:54:41 -0500, Jantje. wrote:
>>
>>I have 55 users (mostly for deamons, but not all) having UID=0. When I do a
>>ls -l
>>on any directory, I see the files belonging to root (owner uid = 0) are
>>attributed to belong
On Wed, 3 May 2017 04:54:41 -0500, Jantje. wrote:
>
>I have 55 users (mostly for deamons, but not all) having UID=0. When I do a
>ls -l
>on any directory, I see the files belonging to root (owner uid = 0) are
>attributed to belong to one user ID out of that list of 55. I know the UID is
>what i
Dear Listers,
I have 55 users (mostly for deamons, but not all) having UID=0. When I do a
ls -l
on any directory, I see the files belonging to root (owner uid = 0) are
attributed to belong to one user ID out of that list of 55. I know the UID is
what is holding the single truth about ownership,
