On 5/7/2021 12:38 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
I always thought of mhvrcfs as where "core MVS" documentation comments go:
the MHV part is "mid-Hudson Valley." But I asked somewhere (here? Someone at
IBM?) where to send a comment relative to some non "core" product (COBOL?)
and was told that mhvrcfs w
iate.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Bob Bridges
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Documentation black hole.
For me, also...eventually. Not always right aw
For me, also...eventually. Not always right away.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* "Utah Risks Loosing its Best Teachers" -a Salt-Lake-Tribune headline
cited ("obviously it's already too late") by Randy Cassingham in the
2007-01-07 issue of This Is True */
-Orig
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM Documentation black hole.
I raised some comments on MQ on z/OS in the IBM documentation at the
beginning of April. I've checked with the IBM ID team - and they haven't
got the comments yet.
I recall that someone said they had given comments on z/OS documentat
On 5/7/2021 9:55 AM, Colin Paice wrote:
I raised some comments on MQ on z/OS in the IBM documentation at the
beginning of April. I've checked with the IBM ID team - and they haven't
got the comments yet.
I recall that someone said they had given comments on z/OS documentation on
IBM Documentati
I raised some comments on MQ on z/OS in the IBM documentation at the
beginning of April. I've checked with the IBM ID team - and they haven't
got the comments yet.
I recall that someone said they had given comments on z/OS documentation on
IBM Documentation and had responses ... so I do not know
