Well, since there's no safe dose of ionizing radiation, and Feynman died of
complications of liposarcoma, he would probably have been the first to get rid
of the damn things out of shoe stores.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
e
> 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
> robin...@sce.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 3:55 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: OT: fluroscopes for shoe fitt
out normal -- other than being an
> attorney.
> >
> >
> > Charles
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Clark Morris
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 3:37 PM
ris
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 3:37 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: OT: fluroscopes for shoe fitting was Re: IBM SR going away?
>
> [Default] On 25 Jun 2019 11:33:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> gary.ja...@telus.com (Gary Jacek) wrote:
>
> >
> >&
ISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: fluroscopes for shoe fitting was Re: IBM SR going away?
>
> Yes, I remember those machines, I thought they were X-rays.
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2019, 09:44:16 AM EDT, Charles Mills <
> charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
>
> Way OT but yes!
List On Behalf Of
Warren Brown
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 11:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: fluroscopes for shoe fitting was Re: IBM SR going away?
Yes, I remember those machines, I thought they were X-rays.
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019, 09:44:16 AM EDT, Charles Mills
o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Warren Brown
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 8:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: fluroscopes for shoe fitting was Re: IBM SR going away?
Yes, I remeberr those machines, I thought they w
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 3:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: OT: fluroscopes for shoe fitting was Re: IBM SR going away?
[Default] On 25 Jun 2019 11:33:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
gary.ja...@telus.com (Gary Jacek) wrote:
>
&
s for shoe fitting was Re: IBM SR going away?
[Default] On 25 Jun 2019 11:33:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
gary.ja...@telus.com (Gary Jacek) wrote:
>
>> I miss neighborhood shoe stores but they probably are not coming back.
>
>Charles -- Do you also miss the fluoroscope that
ehalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 3:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: OT: fluroscopes for shoe fitting was Re: IBM SR going
away?
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:36:54 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
>
>>Charles -- Do you also miss the fluoroscope that let y
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:36:54 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
>
>>Charles -- Do you also miss the fluoroscope that let you look at the bones in
>>your foot?
>>
>I can't speak for Charles but if the fluoroscope was safe I would like
>to see it's revival to help deal with some footwear issues that I am
>h
[Default] On 25 Jun 2019 11:33:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
gary.ja...@telus.com (Gary Jacek) wrote:
>
>> I miss neighborhood shoe stores but they probably are not coming back.
>
>Charles -- Do you also miss the fluoroscope that let you look at the bones in
>your foot?
>
I can't speak for C
Right and when the shoe store started the 'no returns' policy.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 2:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SR going away?
Since that gadget disappeared
e.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gary Jacek
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: IBM SR going away?
> I miss neighborhood shoe stores but they probably are not coming back.
Charles -- Do you also
> I miss neighborhood shoe stores but they probably are not coming back.
Charles -- Do you also miss the fluoroscope that let you look at the bones in
your foot?
Gary
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access in
, June 24, 2019 1:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SR going away?
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:05:52 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>IBM has been moving away from re-inventing and maintaining wheels that were
>perhaps already better-invented and maintained elsewhere.
>
>
https://xkcd.com/1172/
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:41 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> ...
> There will be nostalgia.
>
> -- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access ins
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:05:52 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>IBM has been moving away from re-inventing and maintaining wheels that were
>perhaps already better-invented and maintained elsewhere.
>
>Source code hosted on IBM.com -> github
>Proprietary operating systems -> Linux
>Book manager -> PDF
--
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Finnell
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 12:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SR going away?
Seems like a tactical retreat regardless. Either Blue hardware is no good or
Blue software is l
Seems like a tactical retreat regardless. Either Blue hardware is no good or
Blue software is lacking? Have trouble morphing the obvious paradigm shift into
something positive.
In a message dated 6/24/2019 1:04:05 PM Central Standard Time, charl...@mcn.org
writes:
I would guess that the Salesfo
, June 24, 2019 10:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SR going away?
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:03:09 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>o Salesforce answers the telephone
Why do you assume that Salesforce answers the call?
--
Tom March
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:03:09 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>o Salesforce answers the telephone
Why do you assume that Salesforce answers the call?
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruction
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:43:07 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>I have had several bad experiences and have been vocal about the effectiveness
>of the "new tools" for several years.
>IBM's track record, IMO, has not been very good.
>
>My expectations for "the new SR" are of a similar very low level.
>I
on and function from
the public problem database.
Need I go on?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SR going away?
On 6/24/2019 8:12 AM, Allan Staller wrot
On 6/24/2019 8:12 AM, Allan Staller wrote:
Like I said before. More "new tools", less function, less availability.
On what metric do you base that seemingly flip comment?
Have you had bad experiences with Salesforce support portals from other
tech companies?
--
Phoenix Software Internatio
Like I said before. More "new tools", less function, less availability.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SR going away?
On 6/24/2019 5:59 AM, All
On 6/24/2019 5:59 AM, Allan Staller wrote:
More "new tools", less function, less availability.
IBM is getting out of the business of writing their support portal
themselves.
They are transitioning to Salesforce which is popular, proven technology
https://www.salesforce.com/
--
Phoenix So
More "new tools", less function, less availability.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 7:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM SR going away?
I'm sure many of you have seen this. I&#
I'm sure many of you have seen this. I'm trying to boil down what it really
means.
--
Sorry for the short notice - Hopefully you have heard about this through other
channels. PLEASE share this infor
29 matches
Mail list logo
