You never know: we leapt 7 years a few centuries ago.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: 07 December, 2015 19:37
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
On 2015-12-08, at 02:36, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
> You never know: we leapt 7 years a few centuries ago.
>
> Kees.
>
I miss the reference. Clarify, please.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Gould
> Sent: 07 December, 2015 19:37
>
> Is there a leap week somewhere along the
Steve Thompson wrote:
>Please note: There are three kinds of people in this world, those who can
>count and those who can't.
Count me in... ;-)
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Oops! Sorry!
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 03:32
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
Early Monday? Have a coffee first.
Note the chars after the '365
In Texas Hold'em is what I was talking about.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Randy Hudson
Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2015 23:03
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
In article <20151204220655.5476437.57761
z Systems Development Blog
24x7x52 is already a year (less a few days).
Multiplying by 365 makes it 365 yrars.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 02:35
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IBM
24x7x52 is already a year (less a few days).
Multiplying by 365 makes it 365 yrars.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 02:35
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
On 12/07/2015 04:59 AM, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2015-12-07 o 09:09, Ted MacNEIL pisze:
24x7x52 is already a year (less a few days).
Multiplying by 365 makes it 365 yrars.
That's why I use to write '24/7/365'
Less chance to get acrimonious remark.
Of course both ways of notation do NOT describe
: 04 December, 2015 16:51
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Mike Schwab
<mike.a.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:34 AM, John McKown
<john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote:
too true. I may even s
In fairness, "24x7x365" was originally a shopkeeper/consumer sort of
expression, never intended as a mathematical formula. As in, "We're open
round the clock, every day of the week, every day of the year." Or in other
words "We don't close overnight, we don't close on (insert historically
In article <20151204220655.5476437.57761.60...@yahoo.ca> teD wrote:
> Easier to get a Royal Flush.
> 265,000:1
A dealt royal flush, AKQJT all of the same suit, in any order, is closer to
650,000-1. A drawn royal flush, the jackpot hand on most "video poker" slot
machines, is typically between
You forgot the 52 for the 100%: 24x7x52x365 ;-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: 04 December, 2015 16:51
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015
W dniu 2015-12-04 o 14:55, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
[...]
There are still enough fishes in our oceans, dams and rivers for a while, but
...
Your grand children will ask this question and you're too old to remember
anyways:
Mainframe? Fish? z/OS? Rhinos? MVS? Tigers? RACF? Pandas? What are
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Mike Schwab wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:34 AM, John McKown
> wrote:
>
> > too true. I may even start playing the state lottery, even though that's
> > not really a good idea. I understand enough
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:34 AM, John McKown
wrote:
> too true. I may even start playing the state lottery, even though that's
> not really a good idea. I understand enough statistics to know that.
>
Don't play in Illinois. They only give you and IOU.
--
Mike A
John McKown wrote:
too true. I may even start playing the state lottery, even though that's
not really a good idea. I understand enough statistics to know that.
After I interviewed Prof. William Kahan (designer of the math for the Intel
8087 co-processor) in 1997,
(
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:43:23 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>
> >I've bookmarked that in my browser. Thanks.
>
> Me too.
> Pity the z business here has gone so far down the toilet I've had to wind
> up my company and wander
Shane Ginnane wrote:
>Sobering ;0)
Indeed. I was at a casino once and it amazed me that there are zombies sitting
there all day and night, staring at and feeding those one-arm bandits.
Now and then I do buy a lotto ticket. Half of the time I do get my money back.
Never won enough to buy
I've bookmarked that in my browser. Thanks.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Anthony Giorgio <
niteh...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Did you know that the IBM z Systems development team has a blog? If you
> want to hear news about IBM products right from the experts who develop
> them, then
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 07:34:25 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>too true. I may even start playing the state lottery, even though that's
>not really a good idea. I understand enough statistics to know that.
Don't do that.
I was listening to the BBC overnight a few weeks back, and they must have been
14:21
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:43:23 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>I've bookmarked that in my browser. Thanks.
Me too.
Pity the z business here has gone so far down the toilet I've had to wind up my
company and wander
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:43:23 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>I've bookmarked that in my browser. Thanks.
Me too.
Pity the z business here has gone so far down the toilet I've had to wind up my
company and wander off into retirement..
Interest only now.
Shane ...
John McKown wrote:
>too true. I may even start playing the state lottery, even though that's not
>really a good idea. I understand enough statistics to know that.
and Shane Ginnane wrote:
>Pity the z business here has gone so far down the toilet I've had to wind up
>my company and wander off
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 07:34:25 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>
> >too true. I may even start playing the state lottery, even though that's
> >not really a good idea. I understand enough statistics to know that.
>
> Don't do
On Dec 4, 2015, at 8:37 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
--SNIP
Now and then I do buy a lotto ticket. Half of the time I do get my
money back. Never won enough to buy lots of *more* lotto tickets
anyway. It is more or less throwing away part of your money in the
Some people have beaten the lottery!
http://www.jordanellenberg.com/how-not-to-be-wrong/
A fun book to read.
On 04/12/15 14:29, John McKown wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 07:34:25 -0600, John McKown wrote:
too true. I
On 4 December 2015 at 08:34, John McKown
wrote:
> too true. I may even start playing the state lottery, even though that's
> not really a good idea. I understand enough statistics to know that.
>
Thing is, buying a ticket is almost completely irrelevant to
In <5661ca41.2040...@codemagus.com>, on 12/04/2015
at 05:15 PM, Patrick Hayward said:
>Some people have beaten the lottery!
They're called ""The House".
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Patrick Hayward wrote:
> Some people have beaten the lottery!
> http://www.jordanellenberg.com/how-not-to-be-wrong/
>
> A fun book to read.
Or bought 5M tickets (ran out of time trying to get all 7M possible
combinations).
The BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation - UK) does *NOT* run any lottery.
There are more than one (and a bit) different lotteries licensed in the
UK and no I do not subscribe to any.
The odds as you point out are horrendous.
Originally it was bad enough with 6 numbers at odds of 14.5M : 1
Easier to get a Royal Flush.
265,000:1
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vince Coen
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 16:17
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
The BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation - UK) does
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:39:11 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
>
>The chances of winning in IL are the same but on the downside they
>don't pay if you are a winner
>
>Ed
>
And if you can't win the lottery fair and square, get a job with the
commission and fix it:
On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:39:11 -0600, Ed Gould
wrote:
The chances of winning in IL are the same but on the downside they
don't pay if you are a winner
Ed
And if you can't win the lottery fair and square, get a job
Did you know that the IBM z Systems development team has a blog? If you
want to hear news about IBM products right from the experts who develop
them, then come take a look!
https://ibm.biz/z_systems_development
Some of the topics recent articles have touched upon are:
* zEDC and HSM - A
34 matches
Mail list logo