Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-14 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2018-11-12 o 17:50, Paul Gilmartin pisze: [...] Others: o At times I've needed to resort to PDS rather than PDSE because of cross-plex sharing constraints on PDSE. o Does PDSE impose a stricter constraint on number of records in a single member than PDS? Perhaps 16Mi? Yes. PDSE

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-13 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 11:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:28:44 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Fri, 9 Nov

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-13 Thread Seymour J Metz
16-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 11:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:28:44 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:35:55 -0600, Paul Gilmartin w

IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-12 Thread John Melcher, Jr
What features of XL C are you using that really needs a PDS/E? XPLINK comes to mind, but there are others. IAC try linking it to a PDS/E (library) and not a PDS. Good Luck, John -- This message (and reply) was read by Google and the NSA. ---

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:28:44 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:35:55 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >>It's a shame that the capabilities of PDSE aren't a superset of the >>capabilities >>of PDS. > >They are, with the exception of scatter-load. I believe that is used only for >t

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-12 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:35:55 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >It's a shame that the capabilities of PDSE aren't a superset of the >capabilities >of PDS. They are, with the exception of scatter-load. I believe that is used only for the system nucleus. -- Tom Marchant ---

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-11 Thread Charles Mills
LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. What is this load module written? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-10 Thread Steve Beaver
What is this load module written? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 10:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-10 Thread Charles Mills
arles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 8:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. On 11/9/2018 3:24 PM

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 11/9/2018 3:24 PM, Charles Mills wrote: The debug load module is 18MB. The release compile load module is 002FE160 = ~3 MB. It's reassuring to know it's not YOUR inefficient code that's made this module so massive! ;-) -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Driv

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Tom Brennan
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. In assembler I tended to code that way initially, whil

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Charles Mills
Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. In a

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Tom Brennan
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. http://www.mildredbrennan.com/mvs/error_logic.png On 11/9/2018 2:32 PM, Charles Mills wrote: Geez, again

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Charles Mills
On Behalf Of Joe du Plumber Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 2:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. Charles, Check the module size again and refer to this statement in MVS Program Management: User's Guide and Referen

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Charles Mills
EXACTLY Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. http

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Tom Brennan
http://www.mildredbrennan.com/mvs/error_logic.png On 11/9/2018 2:32 PM, Charles Mills wrote: Geez, again, would it kill them to say that in the error message? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Charles Mills
A.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. Doesn't that size value 011C5D10 mean that the load module is over 16M bytes long? Does PDS support load modules that large? PDSE definitely does, I'm just not certain about PDS. HTH Peter -O

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Charles Mills
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. Charles, Check the module size again and refer to this statement in MVS Program Management: User's Guide and Reference (SA23-1393), Chapter 1 Introduction, subsection Using Util

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Joe du Plumber
Charles, Check the module size again and refer to this statement in MVS Program Management: User's Guide and Reference (SA23-1393), Chapter 1 Introduction, subsection Using Utilities for Program Management, heading IEBCOPY: "However, you cannot convert a program object into a load module an

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES. Can anyone explain the subject message to me? The documentation (not!) helpfully explains that the message means The PD

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:22:33 -0600, Michael Babcock wrote: >Funny you ran across this. We were applying maintenance to Db2 tools >yesterday and received a message from the binder that said a PMO 3 object >could not be stored in a PDS. Holddata for the PTF indicated we needed to >convert the PDS t

Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Michael Babcock
Funny you ran across this. We were applying maintenance to Db2 tools yesterday and received a message from the binder that said a PMO 3 object could not be stored in a PDS. Holddata for the PTF indicated we needed to convert the PDS to PDSE. We did and all was well with the world. Don’t remembe

IGW01203E MEMBER xxxxxxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.

2018-11-09 Thread Charles Mills
Can anyone explain the subject message to me? The documentation (not!) helpfully explains that the message means The PDSE program object exceeded the limitations for PDS load modules and could not be copied (converted) into the specified PDS library. and refers you over to the Binder API manual.