Hello, guys.
I'm stuck here with an IOCDS problem that I can't figure out and need the help
of some experts.
Here's the problem...I have an IOCDS that looks like this:
> *ICP ICP152I SYSTEM=(2827,1) USED BY ICP IOCP
> RESOURCE PARTITION=((CSS(0),(L01,1),(L02,2),(L03,3),(L04,4), *
>
Is there a physical connection between these LPARS , fiber in/out ?
is the message no physical paths available ?
just eyeballing the gen looks correct
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Jones"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:44:37 AM
Subj
7 AM
Subject: IOCDF issue
Hello, guys.
I'm stuck here with an IOCDS problem that I can't figure out and need the help
of some experts.
Here's the problem...I have an IOCDS that looks like this:
> *ICP ICP152I SYSTEM=(2827,1) USED BY ICP IOCP
> RESOURCE PARTITION=((CSS
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Dave Jones
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 6:45 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: IOCDF issue
>
> Hello, guys.
>
> I'm stuck here with a
Hi, Carmen.
The actual message is this:
"Device 7302 cannot be varied online because no channel path is available."
I don't know if that means the fiber is plugged in or not.
Thanks.
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arc
2017 6:45 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: IOCDF issue
>
> Hello, guys.
>
> I'm stuck here with an IOCDS problem that I can't figure out and need the
> help of some experts.
> Here's the problem...I have an IOCDS that looks like this
Agree, I've never had the need to cross channel subsystem or CSS's either
- Original Message -
From: "Doug"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:32:31 AM
Subject: Re: IOCDF issue
Never tried crossing CSS for FCTC.
Spanned channels per
Hello, Lizette.
Sorry no MVS here, this is a pure z/VM complex running on a z12.
The system is about 1200 miles away from where I am, so I can't tell if any
lights on the cables are on or notI do have access to the HMC, thou.
I'm asking here on IBM-MAIN because I suspect there is a lot mor
y, July 21, 2017 9:29:49 AM
Subject: Re: IOCDF issue
Hi, Carmen.
The actual message is this:
"Device 7302 cannot be varied online because no channel path is available."
I don't know if that means the fiber is plugge
All of the CTC devices at 73xx are offline and not available. so it's not just
7302 and 7303, either.
Maybe I should delete all CTCs out of the IOCDS and recreate them all in the
same CSS...?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
I would, if there's no need to cross CSS's I would
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Jones"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:57:33 AM
Subject: Re: IOCDF issue
All of the CTC devices at 73xx are offline and not available. so
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dave Jones
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 7:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IOCDF issue
All of the CTC devices at 73xx are offline and not available. so it's not just
7302 and 7303, either.
Maybe I sho
For what it's worth, here is the parts of my I/O configuration which deals with
the CTC. Sorry for the long post, but we do have cross CSS definitions which
are active. Please note the CUADD is the DESTINATION LPAR. The first digit of
the CUADD is the CSS, the second digit is the LPAR.
CHPID
Thanks for all the help with this, problem resolved.
Have a good one, too.
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
At least tell us what the problem turned out to be.
Tony Thigpen
Dave Jones wrote on 07/24/2017 09:02 AM:
Thanks for all the help with this, problem resolved.
Have a good one, too.
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
I thought there was a limit on the number of devices across Lpars and FCTC
were usually the one to hit it. It is a memory from working at 5/3 with
Rick Chalfant.
Dim memory at best,
Rob Schramm
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017, 9:10 AM Tony Thigpen wrote:
> At least tell us what the problem turned out to
16 matches
Mail list logo