rform well.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 10:35 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ISVs, SMP/E, ... (was: Installation Improvements ...)
&
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:15:33 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>- we have no one who is a drop-dead SMP/E packaging design expert.
>- when we go to people who are SMP/E packaging experts they say "your IEBCOPY
>install is a work of art! It is so simple! Why would you want to change? SMP/E
>is way
y, October 04, 2016 8:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ISVs, SMP/E, ... (was: Installation Improvements ...)
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:08:33 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>
>*Whoa*! Don't panic. This DOES NOT signal that IBM will move everything
>out of SMP/E management. There are no plans to cha
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:08:33 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>
>*Whoa*! Don't panic. This DOES NOT signal that IBM will move everything
>out of SMP/E management. There are no plans to change the packaging for
>products that really need SMP/E or something just like it. But, Software
>Management now
