Re: JOB cards, procs, and TIOTs, o my!

2016-07-01 Thread Phil Smith III
Scott Ballentine wrote: >For your last question, take a look at the JCL Reference. There's a chapter >on started tasks that talks about some of this stuff. (By the way, the doc >uses the term "started job" for what you call a "proc with a JOB card", and >"started proc" for the not-a-JOB case.

Re: JOB cards, procs, and TIOTs, o my!

2016-06-30 Thread Scott Ballentine
Phil, For your last question, take a look at the JCL Reference. There's a chapter on started tasks that talks about some of this stuff. (By the way, the doc uses the term "started job" for what you call a "proc with a JOB card", and "started proc" for the not-a-JOB case.) You might want to

Re: JOB cards, procs, and TIOTs, o my!

2016-06-29 Thread Rob Scott
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: JOB cards, procs, and TIOTs, o my! Noticed something odd-ish. If you put a JOB card in a proc, the TIOT is populated differently, yet what SDSF;DA isn't quite what I'd expect. The behavior below has been observed on 1.12 and 2.1, all JES2. That is, given

JOB cards, procs, and TIOTs, o my!

2016-06-29 Thread Phil Smith III
Noticed something odd-ish. If you put a JOB card in a proc, the TIOT is populated differently, yet what SDSF;DA isn't quite what I'd expect. The behavior below has been observed on 1.12 and 2.1, all JES2. That is, given a PROC called MYPROC, with no JOB card and a label of EXECIT on the EXEC PGM=