I can appreciate that Chris wanted to respond to my post for the sake of the
archives, and he is of course correct about the message source being associated
with USS MSG 7. That cleared up some confusion for me - I haven't had trouble
with TN3270 connections for so long, I've forgotten a lot, i
Scott
> ... CICS, aka kicks, was the Plu
And your point is ...
Just to be clear, in the case of a session between CICS and a "device-type" LU
of which a 3270 system display or printer is an example, these being the types
of LU appearances supported by a TELNET server as appears to be Greg Shir
Greg
This is a summary for IBM-MAIN subscribers interested in this topic.
Following your posting of a copy of your original post in IBMTCP-L, it has been
pursued there.
You reported that your workstation user is no longer experiencing the problem
following a reconfiguration involving a change
ubject: Re: LU Lookup failed - sense 3003
Greg
You still need a pool even if it has only one entry.
I checked the IP and SNA Codes manual and it is misleading. When the first 4
bytes of the sense code are X'' it's a sense code invented by the VTAM
logic which emulate
Chris,
My VTAM is old but I seem to Remember that CICS, aka kicks, was the Plu
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Jul 23, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> Greg
>
> You still need a pool even if it has only one entry.
>
> I checked the IP and SNA Codes manual and it is misleading. When
Greg
You still need a pool even if it has only one entry.
I checked the IP and SNA Codes manual and it is misleading. When the first 4
bytes of the sense code are X'' it's a sense code invented by the VTAM
logic which emulates a "pre/non-SNA" channel-attached 3270, originally 3277s
support
Hello all,
I'm trying to assign an LU to a device with a static IP address. It
successfully connects and receives the USS screen, but when the user presses
enter to connect to CICS, he receives message "unable to establish connection -
LU lookup failed with sense 3003".
If I'm finding the
