Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-25 Thread Thomas Berg
ractive is 'manual.' Batch is 'automatic.' > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of > Charles Mills > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 2:52 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subjec

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-23 Thread Mark Regan
Charles, At work my screen size is 90x160 which I use with TSO and NetView. I use the Passport TN3270 emulator, so in its set up I tell it that the "Telnet Device Type Override" is IBM-DYNAMIC which then uses the MODENT name of D4C32XX3 on the VTAM side for z/OS. IBM-DYNAMIC also works with z/VM t

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Andrew Rowley
On 23/04/2016 01:26 PM, Charles Mills wrote: Aha! You're not coming in through VM I had exactly the same thought when I read your last message, "Ah, you're coming in through VM!" Yes, I connect directly through TCP/IP. I guess with VM you don't have to expose TCP/IP or setup a VPN. Also your

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Charles Mills
:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas TSO4B4 isn't one of the prompts for me. Is it possible someone has customized your system? I know nothing in this area has been changed on my system. ISPF option 0 I have: Screen format: 3. Max

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Charles Mills
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew Rowley Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 7:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas TSO4B4 isn't one of the prompts for me. Is it possible someone has cu

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Andrew Rowley
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew Rowley Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 6:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas I do, and for me it just works. I normally connect with 50 x 140 but I just tried 80 x 140 and it looks fine (also using

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Charles Mills
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Michel Beaulieu Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 6:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas Years ago, you needed a modetab (logmode) entry to match your

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Charles Mills
I missing? Yes, I set Screen Format: 1. Data in 0 Options. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew Rowley Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 6:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen s

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Andrew Rowley
I do, and for me it just works. I normally connect with 50 x 140 but I just tried 80 x 140 and it looks fine (also using Vista). I have never heard of TSO4B4 - I just use "TSO" Andrew Rowley On 23/04/2016 10:51 AM, Charles Mills wrote: Is anyone using a large screen size -- I am trying to u

Re: Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Michel Beaulieu
arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Is anyone using a large screen size -- I am trying to use 80 x 132 -- with > the IBM Dallas Innovation Center? Can you tell me what I need to do to make > it work? I am using Tom Brennan's Vista and i

Large arbitrary 3270 screen sizes and IBM Dallas

2016-04-22 Thread Charles Mills
Is anyone using a large screen size -- I am trying to use 80 x 132 -- with the IBM Dallas Innovation Center? Can you tell me what I need to do to make it work? I am using Tom Brennan's Vista and it works for a Mod 4 if I sign onto "TSO4B4" but when I specify 80 x 132 ISPF comes out "skewed." Anyon