On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I decided I was sated with esoteric languages when I stumbled upon
> (but never attempted to master) (NSFW?):
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%42%72%61%69%6E%66%75%63%6B
>
Don’t forget INT
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:34:13 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>I decided I was sated with esoteric languages when I stumbled upon
>(but never attempted to master) (NSFW?):
lol - would you be surprised to learn there is a similarly named scheduler for
Linux.
The author got a little peeved with the tr
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:20:15 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
>It is sometimes MASPHEGI, as in the ACM proceedings I cited,
>
>Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on MechAnisms for SPEcialization,
>Generalization and inHerItance.
>
Sounds vaguely Italian.
>With or without the terminal 'I' it is an abomina
cussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of John Gilmore
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 6:20 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: MASPEGH? (was new JVM based language)
>
> It is sometimes MASPHEGI, as in the ACM proceedings I cited,
>
> Proceedings
Google thinks it's a city on Long Island.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 6:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MASPEGH? (was new JVM based language
1, 2014 11:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MASPEGH? (was new JVM based language)
It is sometimes MASPHEGI, as in the ACM proceedings I cited,
Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on MechAnisms for SPEcialization,
Generalization and inHerItance.
With or without the terminal &#
It is sometimes MASPHEGI, as in the ACM proceedings I cited,
Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on MechAnisms for SPEcialization,
Generalization and inHerItance.
With or without the terminal 'I' it is an abomination. I am delighted
that google knows little about it, but there are circles in which i
m
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: "Pommier, Rex"
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 11/08/2014 16:23
Subject: MASPEGH? (was new JVM based language)
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discuss
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:40 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
> it is lucid enough, but to read it easily you will need to be
> comfortable with and tolerant of current computer-science jargon.
> (The acronym MASPEGH ought, for example, to have been strangled at or,
> better, aborted before birth, but
