Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
>Mark Zelden
>Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 1:09 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: (External):Re: MODGEN vs AMODGEN
>
>OGL/370 is not a base z/OS component it is an old program product. I think my
>cl
MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: MODGEN vs AMODGEN
OGL/370 is not a base z/OS component it is an old program product. I think my
client dropped it finally at z/OS 2.1.
But being that it is ancient (25 yrs old?), why wouldn't all the maintenance
come accepted with a ServerP
, May 8, 2019 11:42 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: (External):Re: MODGEN vs AMODGEN
>
>On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:50:20 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
>>> To my understanding they are just a target lib and distribution library.
>>
>>Yes, which is why they
: MODGEN vs AMODGEN
On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:50:20 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> To my understanding they are just a target lib and distribution library.
>
>Yes, which is why they are not 9nterchangable. If you want macros from the
>running system, use MODGEN and MTS; if you want on
On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:50:20 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> To my understanding they are just a target lib and distribution library.
>
>Yes, which is why they are not 9nterchangable. If you want macros from the
>running system, use MODGEN and MTS; if you want only the accepted service,
>use AM
edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Peter
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 12:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: MODGEN vs AMODGEN
Hi
This is just for my knowledge sake.
While assembling a assembler source code I have seen few
-Origin l Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>> Behalf Of Peter
>> Sent: 08 May, 2019 6:40
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: MODGEN vs AMODGEN
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> This is just for my know
On 2019-05-08 2:39 PM, Peter wrote:
Does it really makes any difference between the two ?
That depends on what maintenance you have applied but not accepted.
I would guess that JCL using AMODGEN in the assembler SYSLIB
concatenation dates from (or is cloned from JCL that dates from) the
time
I am wrong.
thanks
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Peter"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 11:39:30 PM
Subject: MODGEN vs AMODGEN
Hi
This is just for my knowledge sake.
While assembling a assembler source code I have seen few JCL usi
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter
> Sent: 08 May, 2019 6:40
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: MODGEN vs AMODGEN
>
> Hi
>
> This is just for my knowledge sake.
>
> While assembling a assembler source code I have seen few JCL using MODGEN
> and AMODGEN s
Hi
This is just for my knowledge sake.
While assembling a assembler source code I have seen few JCL using MODGEN
and AMODGEN sometimes.
Does it really makes any difference between the two ?
To my understanding they are just a target lib and distribution library.
Peter
11 matches
Mail list logo
