A, VIPALINK2, very much like the first,
>>>>>>except with IPADDR 7.7.7.8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Do I need to create more IPAQENET INTERFACES (with or without new ports)
>>>>>>and give them a SOURCEVIPAINT VIPALINK2?
>>>
;
>>>>>Or is there any way to simply use the current existing IPAQENET INTERFACEs
>>>>>and associate them with VIPALINK2?
>>>>>
>>>>>The obvious challengewwould be, how would the app/system know which VIPA
>>>>>to use? Fai
t;
> V tcpip,obey,dsn= (points to new info) or combined. TCPIP will sort it out
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> roscoe5
> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2024 3:50 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Fw: Multiple VI
Classification: Confidential
Firewall isue?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
roscoe5
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 8:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Multiple VIPAs
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you
Classification: Confidential
V tcpip,obey,dsn= (points to new info) or combined. TCPIP will sort it out
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
roscoe5
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2024 3:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Fw: Multiple VIPAs
> NTTERFACE LINK0020
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DEFINE IPAQENET
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PORTNAME T0020
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IPADR 10.1.1.2/29
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>&g
new ports)
>>>>>> and give them a SOURCEVIPAINT VIPALINK2?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or is there any way to simply use the current existing IPAQENET
>>>>>> INTERFACEs and associate them with VIPALINK2?
>>>>>>
>&
d message --
From: roscoe5
Date: On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 6:39 PM
Subject: Fw: Multiple VIPAs
To:ibm-m...@listserv.ua.edux
Cc:
Hello,
In our TCP/IP (z/OS 3.1) we define OSA interfaces with IP addresses, and use
the SourceVipaInt to refer to a Virtual IP address/interface. That much is
w
.7.8 shulld go back out on
>>>>7.7.7.8.
>>>>
>>>>Beyond the above technical question, some may want to ask why? What is tobe
>>>>gained.
>>>>
>>>>The answeris,multiple applications are using 7.7.7.7 with most unse
ntend to require ALL traffic on 7.7.7.8 be AT-TLS encrypted.
>>>
>>>Then test and migrate apps, independently, on to 7.7.7.8.
>>>
>>>Thanking in advance,
>>>
>>>Bob
>>>
>>>ennt from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iO
>>
>>On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 5:22 PM, roscoe5 <[rosc...@prtoonmail.com](mailto:On
>>Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 5:22 PM, roscoe5 < wrote:
>>
>>> Never mind, I figured it out.
>>> As is too often, I was making it more complicated than necessary.
>>>
-requ...@listserv.ua.edu](mailto:On Fri, Aug 2, 2024
>> at 6:43 PM, roscoe5 < wrote:
>>
>>> Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS
>>>
>>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>>> From: roscoe5
>>>> Dat
t; <[056b62686b81-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu](mailto:On Fri, Aug 2, 2024
> at 6:43 PM, roscoe5 < wrote:
>
>> Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS
>>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: roscoe5
>>>
oe5 < wrote:
> Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS
>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: roscoe5
>> Date: On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 6:39 PM
>> Subject: Fw: Multiple VIPAs
>> To: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.edux
>> Cc:
&g
Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: roscoe5
> Date: On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 6:39 PM
> Subject: Fw: Multiple VIPAs
> To: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.edux
> Cc:
>
> Hello,
> In our TCP/IP (z/OS 3.1) we
15 matches
Mail list logo
