[Default] On 18 May 2021 17:15:54 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
ponce...@bcs.org.uk (CM Poncelet) wrote:

>With all due respect, anyone who has difficulty coding JCL COND=
>statements should consider *not* working with IBM mainframe systems.

as someone who had to play cute games with COND= I would consign the
designers of it to the same hell as the designers of Little Endian
which I consider to be store scrambled.  This latter idiocy means that
there has to be big-endian UTF-16 and little-endian UTF-16.

Clark Morris
> 
>All boolean conditional execution steps can be handled using only COND=
>statements. I submitted a paper on this & it was published in
>"Computing" in 1989. I would but cannot attach it, as uploading PDF
>files to this discussion list is not permitted.
> 
>No sysprog worth his salt has ever had a problem with coding JCL COND=
>statements. 
> 
>Likewise IF/THEN statements belong in "JCL for dummies" - as do symbols
>in JCL and SYSIN. Ditto IF/THEN <etc.> in assembler.
> 
>Chris Poncelet (r)
> 
>
>.
>On 18/05/2021 14:02, Charles Mills wrote:
>> Yeah, and IF/THEN is slightly better than COND=
>>
>> Also symbols in SYSIN data.
>>
>> Charles
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
>> Behalf Of Steve Horein
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:35 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Best catch up resources for MVS / ZOS Technologies
>>
>> I would argue JCL got better when symbols were allowed! :-)
>> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=es-symlist-parameter
>>
>> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:46 PM Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Steve, let me wade in here and suggest some big picture. I think SHARE and
>>> such is great for the details.
>>>
>>> What has changed since 2001? An idiosyncratic, IMHO list:
>>>
>>> - In 2001 SNA was yielding to TCP/IP. That transition has continued. An
>>> awful lot of mainframe connectivity is now TCP/IP. Lots and lots of
>>> Internet connectivity to the mainframe.
>>> - Security is huge. Encryption is hot. Zero Trust is the buzzword of the
>>> month.
>>> - Everything is of course bigger. Z hardware goes up to what? 4TB real?
>>> Someone will correct me if that is wrong.
>>> - Tape drives have pretty much gone away. They live on as virtual,
>>> emulated-on-DASD tape drives.
>>> - The Cloud. Read any airline magazine for the latest.
>>> - Remember VM? It was pretty moribund in 2001. It has found new life
>>> hosting thousands of Linux instances. Yes, Linux running like a champ on Z
>>> hardware. Mainframe Linux is huge. You can run Linux in a region of MVS in
>>> a "container."
>>> - Speaking of which, there is a Z box that will not IPL z/OS! It is called
>>> Linux One. It's a mainframe with a bit hobbled somewhere such that
>>> mainframe operating systems will not IPL, only Linux.
>>> - Lots of new features in core MVS but you would fully recognize the
>>> environment. If you sit down at a TSO/ISPF session it will seem like
>>> nothing has changed. JCL has not gotten any better (or any worse,
>>> thankfully).
>>> - Remember the issue of "above the (24-bit) line"? It is still there, but
>>> pretty much in the background. The new thing is data and execution "above
>>> the (2GB/31-bit) bar." Lots of software products are exploiting data above
>>> 2GB, and code can even run there, with lots of limitations. AMODE/RMODE 64.
>>> - IBM JES3 is dead. Long live Phoenix JES3 plus. IBM ditched JES3, and
>>> Phoenix picked it up.
>>> - More emphasis on high level languages. Hardware design is being driven
>>> by the Java folks and the compiler folks. Lots of new hardware
>>> instructions. Hardware cycle times are not getting any faster, but
>>> instructions do more per cycle. Caching getting more sophisticated and more
>>> critical. The concept of "how long does an LR take" has totally
>>> disappeared. It is a question with no answer other than "it depends."
>>>
>>> Anyone else want to weigh in?
>>>
>>> Charles
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>>> Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
>>> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 6:58 PM
>>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>>> Subject: Re: Best catch up resources for MVS / ZOS Technologies
>>>
>>> I would suggest SHARE presentations and perhaps Marna Walle's migration
>>> guides
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
>>>> Behalf Of Steve Estle
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 6:42 PM
>>>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>>>> Subject: Best catch up resources for MVS / ZOS Technologies
>>>>
>>>> Hello Everyone in Mainframe Land,
>>>>
>>>> I've been out of the mainframe world since about 2001, but spent the
>>> prior
>>>> 20 years immersed in that world working with everything from MVS/370 to
>>>> MVS/ESA and VM, performance and capacity planning disciplines across a
>>>> variety of situations in the IT Services and consulting spaces.  I, am,
>>> now as a
>>>> "IT Infrastructure Engineer- IBM z/OS Mainframe Engineer" after nearly 20
>>>> years of other activities (Project Mgmt, entrepreneur, etc) am about to
>>>> potentially come back into a new mainframe role and I need to catch up as
>>>> quickly as possible.  Any suggestions on ways to fill in the gaps for
>>> ZOS, ZVM,
>>>> hardware, performance, etc?  Bottom line I'm looking for that gap
>>> education
>>>> to as quickly as possible get up to speed with changes in platforms
>>> since 2001.
>>>> If prefer to call - all my info is below.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Steve Estle
>>>> 303-604-0925
>>>> sest...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> .
>>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to