We're trying to build a stand-alone restore tape on a virtual tape. Does
anyone know if it is possible to have a NL virtual tape in a TS7700 and if
so, how do you initialize it to NL? Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / si
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Roger Craig wrote:
> We're trying to build a stand-alone restore tape on a virtual tape. Does
> anyone know if it is possible to have a NL virtual tape in a TS7700 and if
> so, how do you initialize it to NL? Thanks.
I don't know if you _ca
y, July 09, 2014 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] NL Virtual Tape
We're trying to build a stand-alone restore tape on a virtual tape. Does
anyone know if it is possible to have a NL virtual tape in a TS7700 and if
so, how do you initialize it
W dniu 2014-07-09 20:03, John McKown pisze:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Roger Craig wrote:
We're trying to build a stand-alone restore tape on a virtual tape. Does
anyone know if it is possible to have a NL virtual tape in a TS7700 and if
so, how do you initialize it to NL? Thank
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, R.S. wrote:
>> Of course, you must have appropriate authority to do BLP processing.
>> Exactly how is generally shop specific.
>>
>
> Just curious: Why don't you code RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,DSORG=PS instead of
> DCB=(SYS1.MACLIB,DSORG=PS)?
> BTW: AFAIK the above will cr
W dniu 2014-07-09 21:01, John McKown pisze:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, R.S. wrote:
Of course, you must have appropriate authority to do BLP processing.
Exactly how is generally shop specific.
Just curious: Why don't you code RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,DSORG=PS instead of
DCB=(SYS1.MACLIB,DSORG=P
Roger, The TS7700 doesn't care what you write on the tape, but the system tends
to want them all to be standard label.
However, I do recall that we made specific support in DFSMSrmm to support both
non-specific NL and specific NL processing in all system managed tapes.
However, you do need the
WARNING: I'm not working with RMM, but ...
Mike Wood wrote:
>rmm uses the volser provided by the TS7700 via OAM to track what you are doing
>and does whatever is necessary to allow the change to NL and, probably
>unfortunately, I suspect it will insist on relabelling back to SL on return to
>s
