I tried it on our machine.
Java is in PATH:
MV21:/MV21/tmp$ java -version
java version 1.6.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pmz3160sr7-20091215_02(SR7))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 z/OS s390-31
jvmmz3160sr7-20091214_49398 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
J9VM -
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 05:57:58 -0600, Jantje wrote:
/usr/lpp/java/bin/java –version
will work.
Not at our site:
user@OS/390.24.00: /usr/lpp/java/bin/java -version
/usr/lpp/java/bin/java: FSUM7351 not found
... because:
user@OS/390.24.00: ls -al /usr/lpp/java
total 96
drwxr-xr-x
/usr/lpp/java/bin/java java –version
That's one java too many.
/usr/lpp/java/bin/java –version
will work.
Cheers,
Jantje.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
at the prompt i issue
(the fully qualifed path name is on purpose here):
/usr/lpp/java/bin/java java ?version
I don't have access to a system at the moment, so I might be wrong. Anyway if
there is no typo in the command line as show, I think the java is duplicate.
The first one at the
to all who contributed to this thread both in ibm-main and in mvs-oe after
about 1459 hrs (2:59 p.m.) last friday:
(mainly Messrs Mms Barkow, Justice, Hochhalter, Kugler, Carros, Gilmartin)
personal problems have supervened in my life to prevent me from trying your
various suggestions, and
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
thanks, but that didn't help
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Skeldum, William
Sent: Friday, 06 February, 2015 14:20
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
thanks, but that didn't help
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Skeldum, William
Sent: Friday, 06 February, 2015 14:20
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
Try putting
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
it's 31-bit; do not have 64-bit
Are you trying to run the 32 bit or 64 bit version of java?
Try the alternate one if you have it installed.
thanks, but that didn't help
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Of Skeldum, William
Sent: Friday, 06 February, 2015 14:20
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
Try putting a ./ in front of the command to tell it to look in the current
directory:
$ cd /usr/lpp/java/J7.0/bin
$ java -cp . -version
java: FSUM7351 not found
$ ./java -cp
, Tuco
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 2:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
thanks, but that didn't help
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Skeldum, William
Sent: Friday, 06
: NO response to java -version
What release of java are you trying to run?
this is java 1.6.0
Maybe you are getting the old TCP/IP problem.
Can you ping the ip address of the lpar?
i am within the lpar itself or maybe i don't understand the
question (sorry not trying to be smart or give you
: NO response to java -version
yeah, that's what i'm concluding -- but i'd like to know what's wrong w/ this
one lest i do the same wrong thing when i install the 64-bit version thanks
-fullversion does NOT give all the info that -version does, in spite of the
name.
There is something wrong
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
yeah, that's what i'm concluding -- but i'd like to know what's wrong w/ this
one lest i do the same wrong thing when i install the 64-bit version thanks
-fullversion does NOT give all the info that -version does, in spite
: NO response to java -version
I had this problem a while ago with an older version of java that was going
out to TCP/IP when trying to get the version number.
There was something wrong with TCP/IP on the sysprog test lpar at the time and
it looked like java was hanging.
But newer releases of java
.
Try getting the 64 bit version and install it without SMPE.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bonno, Tuco
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 2:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
well
cross-posting to ibm-main, mvs-oe
i'm in z/os 1.13
located in /usr/lpp/java/bin
when i issue ls –la
i can see that the executable java is there
when i issue a printenv PATH i get this:
.:bin:/usr/lpp/java/bin:/usr/sbin:/
again located in /usr/lpp/java/bin
at the prompt i issue
(the fully
: Re: NO response to java -version
thanks, but that didn't help
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Skeldum, William
Sent: Friday, 06 February, 2015 14:20
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java
of java if running 32 bit and vice verse.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bonno, Tuco
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 2:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
What release of java
, Tuco
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 2:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
tried that too; didn't help ...
cd to java/bin directory and enter:
./java -cp . -version
Your CLASSPATH may not be set.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
access.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bonno, Tuco
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 1:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: NO response to java -version
cross-posting to ibm-main, mvs-oe
i'm in z/os 1.13
located
] On Behalf
Of Bonno, Tuco
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 2:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NO response to java -version
well i be darned --- the java -fullversion does give me a one-line response;
but isn't there supposed to be more? i could swear that several years ago when
i did
21 matches
Mail list logo
