Extremely poor, many errors of fact, date info totally wrong.
All in all written by someone from a Uni background or has read it from
a wiki site that had bad data.
Or where I come from 'GIGO'.
Vince
On 10/04/15 21:00, John McKown wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05pn66z?hootPostID
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05pn66z?hootPostID=c190dafd1758bd2afcc8e0ec0e6b7b36
I got this via Twitter and am at work, so cannot view it now. But it at
least sounds like it might be interesting. And gives us something to start
the weekend off viewing.
--
If you sent twitter messages while e
