-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured
I never said anything about production. This would be (in our envi
SERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured
I never said anything about production. This would be (in our environment,
anyway) set automatically for any devel
ridge.com>
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 8:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured
I agree with Jeffrey's comment and will add one of my own: No program should
be installed into QA or UAT or production libraries with SSRANGE or ZONEC
___
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of
Jeffrey Holst <jeffrey.ho...@pnc.com>
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 7:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured
Unless you have other
l, don't do that!"
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jeffrey Holst
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured
Unless you have
Unless you have other specific examples, both NUMCHECK and SSRANGE already
offer the ABD sub-option. I would think the RFE would be rejected as already
delivered.
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:19:14 +, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>Not yet submitted. Please comment.
>
Not yet submitted. Please comment.
COBOL Language Environment “warning” messages (severity code 1) are written to
the destination supplied by the MSGFILE runtime option. This defaults to
CEEMSG for batch jobs and the CESE TD queue for CICS (where CESE is generally
mapped to the CEEMSG DD…)