Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured

2017-08-21 Thread Frank Swarbrick
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured I never said anything about production. This would be (in our envi

Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured

2017-08-19 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
SERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured I never said anything about production. This would be (in our environment, anyway) set automatically for any devel

Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured

2017-08-18 Thread Frank Swarbrick
ridge.com> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 8:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured I agree with Jeffrey's comment and will add one of my own: No program should be installed into QA or UAT or production libraries with SSRANGE or ZONEC

Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured

2017-08-18 Thread Frank Swarbrick
___ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Jeffrey Holst <jeffrey.ho...@pnc.com> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 7:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured Unless you have other

Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured

2017-08-18 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
l, don't do that!" Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Holst Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 9:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured Unless you have

Re: Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured

2017-08-18 Thread Jeffrey Holst
Unless you have other specific examples, both NUMCHECK and SSRANGE already offer the ABD sub-option. I would think the RFE would be rejected as already delivered. On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:19:14 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote: >Not yet submitted. Please comment. >

Possible COBOL RFE to abend if any warnings occured

2017-08-17 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Not yet submitted. Please comment. COBOL Language Environment “warning” messages (severity code 1) are written to the destination supplied by the MSGFILE runtime option. This defaults to CEEMSG for batch jobs and the CESE TD queue for CICS (where CESE is generally mapped to the CEEMSG DD…)