On 2020-04-23 4:58 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
So is that record of the previous allocation kept in some
private/undocumented place by allocation, or do TIOT entries remain in
place (perhaps flagged somehow) and provide all the necessary info?
Deconcatenation is pretty much just restoring the DD
: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on dynamic concatenation
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 14:33, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> It's the answer to your question: the manual is correct but fails to connect
> the dots. The dynamic concatenation *doe
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 14:33, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> It's the answer to your question: the manual is correct but fails to connect
> the dots. The dynamic concatenation *does* remove the
> association of the other ddnames, but it does not delete the record that
> there had previously been
of
Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 2:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on dynamic concatenation
Is that supposed to be an answer to my questions or is it intended to be a
related FYI?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Subject: Re: Question on dynamic concatenation
Dynamic deconcatenation logically disconnects the members of a dynamically
concatenated group. You
identify the concatenated group to be deconcatenated by specifying the
ddname of the group.
When a concatenated group is dynamically deconcatenated
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Question on dynamic concatenation
I could
I could solve this by experimentation but it would take a bunch of work. I
am hoping someone here knows the answer.
Under dynamic concatenation
(https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r
4.ieaa800/concat.htm) it says "The name associated with the concatenated
