Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-27 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:17:32 -0400 Kirk Talman wrote: :>Interesting patent. :>There is prior art in this area dating back at least 2 decades. I used :>the technique they described in a program less than a decade ago to manage :>allocation and freeing of cells in a multi-tasking environment.

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-27 Thread Kirk Talman
Interesting patent. There is prior art in this area dating back at least 2 decades. I used the technique they described in a program less than a decade ago to manage allocation and freeing of cells in a multi-tasking environment. The same technique (w/o multi-tasking environment and requireme

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-26 Thread John Gilmore
Joel C. Ewing is right, and I was one of the principal offenders. The supported values, prefixes, and abbreviations are 2^10, kibi, Ki 2^20, mebi, Mi 2^30, gibi, Gi 2^40, tebi, Ti 2^50, pebi, Pi 2^60, exbi, Ei Thus, for example, mebibit, mebibyte are correct; but mibibit, mibibyte are not. Car

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-25 Thread Joel C. Ewing
Nitpick on an error that is getting repeated: 2**20 Bytes = MiB is "mebibytes" (not "mibibytes"), as it is derived from "mega binary". I hope the erroneous form is not a quote from a some manual. Reference: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html JC Ewing On 09/25/2012 01:26 PM, Ji

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-25 Thread John Gilmore
The patent that Jim Mulder cited: http://www.google.com/patents/US20090100243 contains very useful information. It begins with the text: A virtual storage technique is provided to manage a cell pool or a set of cell pools which can be used to satisfy variable-size storage requests. The algorit

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-25 Thread David Stokes
John Gilmore wrote >I should have thought that Peter Relson's post had clarified these >issues more than adequately. Ah. As enjoyable as always to hear your opinion, Mr. Gilmore, although I couldn't myself find very much in Peter Relson's posting that seemed especially helpful (not that I was lo

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-25 Thread Jim Mulder
> IARCP64 makes above-the-bar storage available in chunks, one mibibyte > at a time; and requesters must submanage this storage themselves. > IARST64 submanages such chunks for you. IARV64 makes above-the-bar storage available in chunks, one mibibyte at a time; and requesters must submanage t

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-25 Thread John Gilmore
in common by > IARCP64 and IARST64 are: > No contraction of pools is currently supported in z/OS V1R10. > Boundaries are forced to quadword, cache line, or page, depending on cell > size. > Trailers are used when they fit, to detect overruns. > Double free detected and rej

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-24 Thread David Stokes
dword, cache line, or page, depending on cell size. Trailers are used when they fit, to detect overruns. Double free detected and rejected with abend. Date:Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:06:31 -0600 From:Steve Comstock Subject: Questions about IARST64 Well, I'm a bit confused by the do

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-22 Thread Peter Relson
>Use IARST64 to request 64-bit Storage Services. You made one heck of a leap to take this sentence to mean more than it says. But IARST64 does not, as you thought, have anything directly to do with cell pools. But it may be used to obtain the storage for the pool when you invoke IARCP64. The inf

Re: Questions about IARST64

2012-09-21 Thread Don Poitras
In article <505c9087.8030...@trainersfriend.com> you wrote: > Well, I'm a bit confused by the docs on this service. > In the Assembler Services Reference, the write up begins: > "Use IARST64 to request 64-bit Storage Services." > so I at first assumed this has nothing to do with cell > pools but is

Questions about IARST64

2012-09-21 Thread Steve Comstock
Well, I'm a bit confused by the docs on this service. In the Assembler Services Reference, the write up begins: "Use IARST64 to request 64-bit Storage Services." so I at first assumed this has nothing to do with cell pools but is an alternative to IARV64 (no guard area, etc.) But just a few li