RRSF Vtam vs TCPIP

2015-10-15 Thread White, Andy
Maybe someone can help me here: I thought IBM made a SOD for RRSF that we should go to TCPIP vs APPC. We currently have 15+ systems using RRSF via APPC and we are on z/OS 2.1 on all of them. I know it's been said many times at SHARE its recommended you change to TCPIP so the links can be encrypt

Re: RRSF Vtam vs TCPIP

2015-10-15 Thread Mike Schwab
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/zos_sods.html then search for APPC: z/OS statement of direction August 8, 2006 IBM plans to take the following actions effective with the general availability of z/OS V1.8: The APPC Application Suite is a set of common applications originally designed to en

Re: RRSF Vtam vs TCPIP

2015-10-15 Thread Mike Wawiorko
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: 15 October 2015 16:02 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RRSF Vtam vs TCPIP http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/zos_sods.html then search for APPC: z/OS statement of direction August 8,

Re: RRSF Vtam vs TCPIP

2015-10-15 Thread John Eells
White, Andy wrote: Maybe someone can help me here: I thought IBM made a SOD for RRSF that we should go to TCPIP vs APPC. We currently have 15+ systems using RRSF via APPC and we are on z/OS 2.1 on all of them. I know it's been said many times at SHARE its recommended you change to TCPIP so the