From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Reading a scratch tape
On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 13:44:16 +, Sey
On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 13:44:16 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>EXEC2 didn't exist in 1971.
>
But later, could EXEC2 read a PDSE?
>
>From: Seymour J Metz
>Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2024 8:09 PM
>
>I would assume that it's difficult or impossible with PDSE,
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Reading a scratch tape
I would assume that it's difficult or impossible with PDSE, but that there is
less need in PDSE2, due to generations.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א
Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 6:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Reading a scratch tape
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 22:41:03 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
>Actually, it doe
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 22:41:03 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
>Actually, it does make sense (at least to me) to have this threshold set.
>We've gone back more than once to rescue a developer or support person who
>inadvertently scratched a tape the day before and we were able to recover it
>for
. Without the expire hold, as soon as the tape
is scratch, the data is gone.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 4:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Reading a scratch t
