On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 06:54:09 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>
>Between steps can't be pipes, can be VIO. Between jobs can be pipes, can't
>be VIO.
>
Pipes could work between steps if the PIPE SUBSYS has an implied ELASTIC
stage. But that's just reinventing VIO. PIPE SUBSYS must do some buffering
to
Between steps can't be pipes, can be VIO. Between jobs can be pipes, can't
be VIO.
That second sentence depends on the ability to schedule two jobs (possibly
originally steps of the same job) alongside each other.
Fun stuff but / and somewhat complex - which is what inspired me to start
writing
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:39:17 -0500, Hobart Spitz wrote:
>
>Intra-JOB pipe - This would be similar to VIO; it doesn't exist otherwise.
>I think it would be a great feature.
>
Between steps? One might just as well use VIO.
-- gil
---
dcast Series (With Marna Walle):
https://anchor.fm/marna-walle
Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
From: "David Crayford"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 28/09/2021 08:17
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: The Business Case for BatchPipe
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 28/09/2021 08:17
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: The Business Case for BatchPipes in the
z/OS Base (was: ... Pipes ...)
Sent by:"IBM Mainframe Discussion List"
This first question I would ask is does IBM actually "own" BatchPipes o
This first question I would ask is does IBM actually "own" BatchPipes or
did the flog it off to an ISV like most of their other software? If it's
the latter then they will be in no position to make it freely available.
Secondly, rather than pine for something that isn't available why not
just
Gil wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:26:51 -0500, Hobart Spitz wrote:
>>I'm going to pivot here. I'm putting my support behind putting BatchPipes
>>in the z/OS base (rather than just Pipes). If you agree, please
>>write/support such a requirement and/or educate your management to get
>>interested.
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:26:51 -0500, Hobart Spitz wrote:
>I'm going to pivot here. I'm putting my support behind putting BatchPipes
>in the z/OS base (rather than just Pipes). If you agree, please
>write/support such a requirement and/or educate your management to get
>interested. BatchPipes inc
