A.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 4:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SDSF Mystery
The thing is in the z/OS 2.2 What's new guide they explicitly discuss this.
The section is even titled HASPINDX removal.
HASPINDX removal
Description: Th
46 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF Mystery
I opened an SR. Problem is not so
: SDSF Mystery
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:23:12 +
I opened an SR. Problem is not so much whether HASPINDX is needed, but that the
sudden need for it was unexpected and inexplicable. I spent a lot of time on
this from Friday until this morning. A message would have saved KGs of grief
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SDSF Mystery
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PM24416
For z/OS 1.11 and up, suggests leaving HASPINDX in case z/OS can't resolve the
log.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.isfa500/haspall.htm
Sampl
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PM24416
For z/OS 1.11 and up, suggests leaving HASPINDX in case z/OS can't
resolve the log.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.isfa500/haspall.htm
Sample job ISFISALC contains an allocation for the ISF.HASPIND
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:24:12 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
>That's it! We recover only one member of a two member sysplex. Normally we use
>operlog,
> but the logstream did not get created on this IPL, so SDSF has to use syslog.
> I can now create
> the problem at will with 'SYSID missing-sys
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Andy Higgins
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SDSF Mystery
Skip, I've noticed that SDSF will try to allocate HASPINDX if you invoke LOG
SYSLOG with SYSID set
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:24:18 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
>IPLed a system in DR mode. Exact mirrored copy of prod. SDSF log won't work in
>DR because HASPINDX shows migrated to tape, inaccessible in DR. But function
>works fine in prod. I can't find any difference. System is 2.1. How can log
Skip, I've noticed that SDSF will try to allocate HASPINDX if you invoke LOG
SYSLOG with SYSID set to a system that's an inactive member of the MAS.
hth
Andy
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:24:18 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
>IPLed a system in DR mode. Exact mirrored copy of prod. SDSF log won't work
Finger fault. Can you tell I'm doing my taxes?
In a message dated 4/10/2016 9:04:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ste...@copper.net writes:
The IRS does not have any components at IBM
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a
Nooo!!! The IRS does not have any components at IBM.
ISRDDN NOT IRSDDN, you thinks you pays syntax now, just wait.
[Ok, it has been a long day trying to figure out a problem with a
system running Winderz]
On 04/10/2016 08:07 PM, Edward Finnell wrote:
Almost sounds like there's a spu
Almost sounds like there's a spurious ISFPARMS in LNKLST or LOGON proc.
IRSDDN should ferret it out.
In a message dated 4/10/2016 6:18:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
jesse1.robin...@sce.com writes:
Just too crazy. It's behaving like an old version. Removed our file name
from ISFPRMxx, t
obile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Field, Alan
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 6:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SDSF Mystery
Skip,
I think HASPIN
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 3:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SDSF Mystery
IPLed a system in DR mode. Exact mirrored copy of prod. SDSF log won't work in
DR because HASPINDX shows migrated to tape, inaccessible in DR. But funct
Are the master catalogs for the two systems IDENTICAL?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 1:24 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: SDSF My
IPLed a system in DR mode. Exact mirrored copy of prod. SDSF log won't work in
DR because HASPINDX shows migrated to tape, inaccessible in DR. But function
works fine in prod. I can't find any difference. System is 2.1. How can log
work in prod without HASP INDEX but fail in DR?
.
.
.
J.O.Skip
16 matches
Mail list logo