Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-22 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
A.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 4:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: SDSF Mystery The thing is in the z/OS 2.2 What's new guide they explicitly discuss this. The section is even titled HASPINDX removal. HASPINDX removal Description: Th

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-12 Thread Jousma, David
46 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SDSF Mystery I opened an SR. Problem is not so

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-11 Thread Richard Pinion
: SDSF Mystery Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:23:12 + I opened an SR. Problem is not so much whether HASPINDX is needed, but that the sudden need for it was unexpected and inexplicable. I spent a lot of time on this from Friday until this morning. A message would have saved KGs of grief

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-11 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: SDSF Mystery http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PM24416 For z/OS 1.11 and up, suggests leaving HASPINDX in case z/OS can't resolve the log. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.isfa500/haspall.htm Sampl

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-11 Thread Mike Schwab
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PM24416 For z/OS 1.11 and up, suggests leaving HASPINDX in case z/OS can't resolve the log. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.isfa500/haspall.htm Sample job ISFISALC contains an allocation for the ISF.HASPIND

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-11 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:24:12 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: >That's it! We recover only one member of a two member sysplex. Normally we use >operlog, > but the logstream did not get created on this IPL, so SDSF has to use syslog. > I can now create > the problem at will with 'SYSID missing-sys

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-11 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Andy Higgins Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:36 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: SDSF Mystery Skip, I've noticed that SDSF will try to allocate HASPINDX if you invoke LOG SYSLOG with SYSID set

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-11 Thread Mark Zelden
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:24:18 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: >IPLed a system in DR mode. Exact mirrored copy of prod. SDSF log won't work in >DR because HASPINDX shows migrated to tape, inaccessible in DR. But function >works fine in prod. I can't find any difference. System is 2.1. How can log

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-11 Thread Andy Higgins
Skip, I've noticed that SDSF will try to allocate HASPINDX if you invoke LOG SYSLOG with SYSID set to a system that's an inactive member of the MAS. hth Andy On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:24:18 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: >IPLed a system in DR mode. Exact mirrored copy of prod. SDSF log won't work

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-10 Thread Edward Finnell
Finger fault. Can you tell I'm doing my taxes? In a message dated 4/10/2016 9:04:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, ste...@copper.net writes: The IRS does not have any components at IBM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-10 Thread Steve Thompson
Nooo!!! The IRS does not have any components at IBM. ISRDDN NOT IRSDDN, you thinks you pays syntax now, just wait. [Ok, it has been a long day trying to figure out a problem with a system running Winderz] On 04/10/2016 08:07 PM, Edward Finnell wrote: Almost sounds like there's a spu

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-10 Thread Edward Finnell
Almost sounds like there's a spurious ISFPARMS in LNKLST or LOGON proc. IRSDDN should ferret it out. In a message dated 4/10/2016 6:18:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time, jesse1.robin...@sce.com writes: Just too crazy. It's behaving like an old version. Removed our file name from ISFPRMxx, t

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-10 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
obile 626-302-7535 Office robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Field, Alan Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 6:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: SDSF Mystery Skip, I think HASPIN

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-09 Thread Field, Alan
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 3:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SDSF Mystery IPLed a system in DR mode. Exact mirrored copy of prod. SDSF log won't work in DR because HASPINDX shows migrated to tape, inaccessible in DR. But funct

Re: SDSF Mystery

2016-04-09 Thread retired mainframer
Are the master catalogs for the two systems IDENTICAL? > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson > Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 1:24 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: SDSF My

SDSF Mystery

2016-04-09 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
IPLed a system in DR mode. Exact mirrored copy of prod. SDSF log won't work in DR because HASPINDX shows migrated to tape, inaccessible in DR. But function works fine in prod. I can't find any difference. System is 2.1. How can log work in prod without HASP INDEX but fail in DR? . . . J.O.Skip