John Eells wrote:
R.S. wrote:
Off-topic note: the document mention z/OS 2.2 can be ran on z9 machine,
which is untrue.
You are, of course, correct. The book has been updated but not the link
to the new level of it. Here is the new level of the book:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/e
R.S. wrote:
Off-topic note: the document mention z/OS 2.2 can be ran on z9 machine,
which is untrue.
You are, of course, correct. The book has been updated but not the link
to the new level of it. Here is the new level of the book:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/e0z3f113.pdf
-
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:10:16 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>Dan Kalmar wrote:
>>
>> I'm reading the User's Guide section on adding a new FUNCTION SYSMOD:
>>
>> So the MCS statements are listed, but why on earth there is no mention of
>> the JCL required to process the MCS input ?
>
>I think what you a
Off-topic note: the document mention z/OS 2.2 can be ran on z9 machine,
which is untrue.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2017-03-27 o 18:52, John Eells pisze:
Dan Kalmar wrote:
Can you still use PROGRAM elements for LE based modules ?
Yes, provided you can bind with the *low
les
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 3:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMP/E Tutorial
Dan Kalmar wrote:
> This may be a dumb question so forgive me in advanc
Dan Kalmar wrote:
This may be a dumb question so forgive me in advance.
I'm reading the User's Guide section on adding a new FUNCTION SYSMOD:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.gim3000/fsmod.htm
So the MCS statements are listed, but why on earth there i
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:47:41 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>
>If you BUILDMCS your current HBB FMID, you will doubtless find
>examples like this one:
>
>++PROGRAM(IWMAM431)
>SYSLIB(SIEALNKE)
>ALIAS(LARM431)
>DISTLIB(AIEALNKE) RELFILE(9) .
>
Which answers the question asked about new fu
Dan Kalmar wrote:
Thanks. Can you provide an example of a PROGRAM definition in a new Function
SYSMOD or point me to such example?
Note: Many followers of this list do not use an NNTP newsreader. You
will probably get faster (and more) responses if you post to the list
rather than to the ne
Dan Kalmar wrote:
Can you still use PROGRAM elements for LE based modules ?
Yes, provided you can bind with the *lowest* level Language Environment
stubs you need, as I'm assured they are compatible with later levels of
z/OS. (The level you need should define your minium supported z/OS
lev
Dan Kalmar wrote:
I will look into these suggestions.
Personally I'd rather stay away from doing link edits during the install as you
can't be sure what gets pulled in.
For many years I worked for a large software vendor and although I never had to
deal with the packaging aspect of products, I
Ah, good - maybe either (a) we were using old doc or, more likely, (b) we
misunderstood. We have some things like SAMPLIB that aren't under SMP/E
control, have been meaning to fix it, and this (perceived) limitation was
standing in the way of making it easy!
---
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> (I don't see the OP. Did this thread originate from Usenet?)
>
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:31:24 -0700, Phil Smith wrote:
>
>> One thing that surprised me (and continues to be a pain) is t
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SMP/E Tutorial
As you can tell from my previous post I am neither an SMP/E expert nor an SMP/E
fan but I think you can have two BANANAs provided they are different kinds of
things. Going into different destinations (target PDS) is not enough, they have
Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 7:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SMP/E Tutorial
As you can tell from my previous post I am neither an SMP/E expert nor an SMP/E
fan but I think you can have two BANANAs provided they are different kinds of
things. Going into
(I don't see the OP. Did this thread originate from Usenet?)
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:31:24 -0700, Phil Smith wrote:
>One thing that surprised me (and continues to be a pain) is that a given
>package can only have one part with a given name. ... Seems kind of primitive
>in this day and age, espe
Smith
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 9:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMP/E Tutorial
One thing that surprised me (and continues to be a pain) is that a given
package can only have one part with a given name. So if you have a sample
program called BANANA and quite reasonably wanted to h
One thing that surprised me (and continues to be a pain) is that a given
package can only have one part with a given name. So if you have a sample
program called BANANA and quite reasonably wanted to have a .JCL library with a
sample job to run it called BANANA, and the source in a .SOURCE libra
Behalf
Of Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 8:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMP/E Tutorial
On 3/27/2017 7:52 AM, Dan Kalmar wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good tutorial for using SMP/E to package a new
> product for distribution ?
Not so much a tutorial, but tr
On 3/27/2017 7:52 AM, Dan Kalmar wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good tutorial for using SMP/E to package a new
product for distribution ?
Not so much a tutorial, but try "IBM, Standard Packaging Rules for
z/OS-Based Products" here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/gimpkg80.pdf
Some pe
19 matches
Mail list logo
