On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:19:59 -0600, Barry Lichtenstein wrote:
>>
>> Does SMP/E respect STRIPSEC? Does it cause no problems, e.g. with
>> RESTORE? How might it interact with the "++MOD(...) CSECT(...)"
>> argument?
>
>Can't really blame SMP/E for accumulating them, that's the binders fault. For
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:36:16 -0600 Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> Oooh! Neat! Thanks. And I see:
>
> z/OS MVS Program Management: User's Guide and Reference
> SA23-1393-00
>
> STRIPSEC={PRIV|YES | NO}
> STRIPSEC=PRIV
> Specifies that unreferenced unnamed sections are to be removed.
>
> This
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:52:43 -0600, Barry Lichtenstein wrote:
>You might try the STRIPSEC option. It does not work on a specific INCLUDE,
>rather the binder will remove any sections which are not used at the end of
>input. There will be a section in the MAP output showing which ones (if any)
