qu...@listserv.ua.edu]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 9:58 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset allocation question
>
> I opened up a ticket with support last night, we discussed the situation and
> he's now taking w
: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 9:58 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset allocation question
>
> I opened up a ticket with support last night, we discussed the situation and
> he's now taking with development. SMP/e CALLLIBS
24, 2021 9:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset allocation question
I opened up a ticket with support last night, we discussed the situation and
he's now taking with development. SMP/e CALLLIBS processing seems to require a
DDDEF and doesn't us
t; Rex
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of
> Mark Jacobs
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:18 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset allocation question
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU on behalf of
> Mark Jacobs 0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 2:05 PM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset allocation qu
on behalf of
Mark Jacobs <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 2:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset allocation question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t
ion.
>
> Rex
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of
> Mark Jacobs
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:18 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset alloc
same libraries when it expects
them to be the same.
Just my opinion.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: SMP/e Dataset allocation question
It is
It is, yes.
SMP1
SCEEOBJ SMP1 PERMCEE.SCEEOBJ Z24A01 3390 SHR
SCEELKEX SMP2 PERMCEE.SCEELKEX Z24A01 3390 SHR
SCEELKED SMP3 PERMCEE.SCEELKED Z24A01 3390 SHR
CSSLIB SMP4 PERMSYS1.CSS
Mark,
Thats probably part of a dynamic concatenation that SMP/E did for a SYSLIB sort
of a input DD name. Is the DDDEF part of a concatenation similar to this?:
DDNAME DDDEFNAM SMPDDNAM TYPE ---DATA SET OR
PATH---
SMP00048
I'm running an apply check with dataset overrides, same DSN, different volume.
Here's one example.
//CSSLIB DD DISP=SHR,UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=Z24AM1,DSN=SYS1.CSSLIB
The SMP APPLY CHECK FILE ALLOCATION REPORT shows that my override is being used,
SYS1.CSSLIB Z24AM1 SHR
But in the dynamic allocation p
11 matches
Mail list logo
