In <556c5f4f.1090...@us.ibm.com>, on 06/01/2015
at 09:34 AM, Kurt Quackenbush said:
>>> " The ++PROGRAM MCS describes a program element (a pre-built load
>>> module or a program object). It must immediately precede the load
>>> module or program object when they are within the SYSMOD.
>>
>> Th
In <6503242797771151.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on
06/01/2015
at 07:40 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:
>On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:22:12 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>>
>>>" The ++PROGRAM MCS describes a program element (a pre-built
" The ++PROGRAM MCS describes a program element (a pre-built load
module or a program object). It must immediately precede the load
module or program object when they are within the SYSMOD.
That would be a good trick. I might believe a GIMZIP compressed
version.
Its no trick. GIMDTS is your f
On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:22:12 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>>" The ++PROGRAM MCS describes a program element (a pre-built load
>>module or a program object). It must immediately precede the load
>>module or program object when they are within the SYSMOD.
>
>That would be a good trick. I
In <0bf72eb9d750401a98a23caab0737...@exmbxprd01.ad.ufl.edu>, on
05/28/2015
at 07:57 PM, "Nims,Alva John (Al)" said:
>" The ++PROGRAM MCS describes a program element (a pre-built load
>module or a program object). It must immediately precede the load
>module or program object when they are with
In <2008381733857340.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on
05/28/2015
at 04:10 PM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:
>If it's a "real mainframe program", it's delivered in individual
>++MOD elements and linked at customer's site with ++JCLIN.
Or indivi
construction question re aliases
On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:23:05 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>... by real mainframe programmers, without benefit of documentation LOL.
>
>We tell them
>
>BINARY
>GET fmid.pax (REPLACE
>
Much the same here, except that by our Corporate Standard th
On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:23:05 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>... by real mainframe programmers, without benefit of documentation LOL.
>
>We tell them
>
>BINARY
>GET fmid.pax (REPLACE
>
Much the same here, except that by our Corporate Standard they
must first un-zip it or un-jar it. Do any have restr
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE MCS construction question re aliases
On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:52:56 -0700, Charles Mills wrote
On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:52:56 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>Geez. See the first paragraph in my OP.
>
>Yeah, a lot of tape in there. When IBM was asking here about software delivery
>not on tape I should have said "will you update the SMPE manuals also?"
>
Me, too.
>Yes, we use GIMZIP. And GIMSMP
cal to its operation.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 1:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE MCS construction question re aliases
On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:21:
On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:21:48 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>OK, great, thanks. I was looking in the "Standard Packaging Rules for z/OS
>Products" and could not make sense out of what they were saying about
>aliases.
>
++PROGRAM and other MCS are defined in SMP/E Reference; RECEIVE,
APPLY, and ACC
(Al)
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE MCS construction question re aliases
Check your "SMP/e for z/OS: Reference" manual, Chapter 2.
" The ++PROGRAM MCS describes a program element (a pre-built load module or
a program object). It
nal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPE MCS construction question re aliases
A question for you real SMPE jockeys out there (as opposed to a pre
A question for you real SMPE jockeys out there (as opposed to a pretender
like me):
In creating SMPE MCS file commands for a load module that has an alias, do I
need just one ++PROGRAM statement for the true module name, or do I need two
(a la the way IEBCOPY deals with aliases), one for the true
15 matches
Mail list logo
