From the listcat
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of retired mainframer
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS primary vsam space allocation
Just out of curiosity, how do you know
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS primary vsam space allocation
From the listcat
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN
Hello all, I know this is late on Friday before a three day weekend, however,
I'm stumped by a problem. We have some vsam files that have a primary
allocation of 398 cyls and a secondary of 398 cyls. The primary extent that is
displayed with in a listcat says that it is 11940 wihich is double
SMS consolidated the primary with secondary because they were allocated back to
back
Doug
.
On May 22, 2015, at 17:10, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Hello all, I know this is late on Friday before a three day weekend, however,
I'm stumped by a problem. We have some vsam files that have
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMS primary vsam space allocation
Hello all, I know this is late on Friday before a three day weekend,
however, I'm stumped
by a problem. We have some vsam files that have a primary allocation of
398 cyls and a
secondary of 398 cyls. The primary extent that is displayed
Reread your post, I don't know if listcat should do that, just that if
space is available for a second extent right behind , vsam will put the
together as one
.
On May 22, 2015, at 17:13, Doug dsh...@bellsouth.net wrote:
SMS consolidated the primary with secondary because they were
Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Doug
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS primary vsam space allocation
Reread your post, I don't know if listcat should do
