Re: SRB dispatching question

t; > > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Peter Relson > Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 7:51 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: SRB dispatching question > > I'll point out that th

Re: SRB dispatching question

On 5/1/2016 3:45 PM, michelbutz wrote: Hi If a nonpreamtable scope=global SRB does a pause And another SRB is scheduled does it get dispatched ? Being non-preemptable means that z/OS won't take control away from the unit of work without cause. Cause being something like a page fault

Re: SRB dispatching question

On 5/2/2016 12:54 PM, Blaicher, Christopher Y. wrote: What parameters were on the IEAMSCHD macros for the two SRB's? If the LLOCK=YES parm is set on both, then there is your problem. A Pause is not allowed while holding *any* class of lock. The Pause request will fail. Greg

Re: SRB dispatching question

On 5/3/2016 4:50 AM, Peter Relson wrote: The system will no longer treat it as such after the pause. So the "globalness" of an SRB is an attribute known only at scheduling time and not something saved/restored in an SSRB? Good to know... -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc

Re: SRB dispatching question

On Tue, 3 May 2016 13:02:43 +, Blaicher, Christopher Y. wrote: >once SRB #1 did the PAUSE, SRB #2, or any other qualifying unit of work, [is] >free to run in the address space It seems to me that whether or not SRB #1 PAUSEs, SRB #2 can be dispatched on another processor. When SRB # 1

Re: SRB dispatching question

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 7:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SRB dispatching question I'll point out that the very fact that a global SRB paused very likely means

Re: SRB dispatching question

Thanks so much the documentation for IEAVPSE2 says "NO LOCKS HELD" Sent from my iPhone > On May 3, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Peter Relson wrote: > > I'll point out that the very fact that a global SRB paused very likely > means that you did not consider the SRB itself truly to be

Re: SRB dispatching question

I'll point out that the very fact that a global SRB paused very likely means that you did not consider the SRB itself truly to be global. The system will no longer treat it as such after the pause. Chris mentioned the local lock. I'm not sure why. You can't pause a work unit that is holding

Re: SRB dispatching question

ion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of michelbutz > Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 2:26 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: SRB dispatching question > > So it DOESN'T get dispatched > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 2, 2016, at 2:17 PM, Bla

Re: SRB dispatching question

o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of michelbutz > Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 2:26 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: SRB dispatching question > > So it DOESN'T get dispatched > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 2, 2016, at 2:17 PM, Blaicher, Chr

Re: SRB dispatching question

Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of michelbutz Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 2:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SRB dispatching question So it DOESN'T get dispatched Sent from my iPhone > On May 2, 2016, at 2:17 PM, Blaic

Re: SRB dispatching question

Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of michelbutz Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 6:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SRB dispatching question Hi If a nonpreamtable scope=global SRB does a pause And another SRB is scheduled does it get dispatched ? Sent from my iPhone

SRB dispatching question

Hi If a nonpreamtable scope=global SRB does a pause And another SRB is scheduled does it get dispatched ? Sent from my iPhone -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to