I do ... I spend most of my day mentoring new sysprogs for Kyndryl ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
er 30, 2022 11:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSPLEX / SYSNAME / SMFID stability
BTW you and GP were my best mentors of that time Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
BTW you and GP were my best mentors of that time Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Gorlinsky [p...@atsmigrations.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 10:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSPLEX / SYSNAME / SMFID stability
You can not believe how many "TAPES" critical to the success of a DR test have
been lost or forgotten. The major one, the standal
You can not believe how many "TAPES" critical to the success of a DR test have
been lost or forgotten. The major one, the standalone IPL utility tape.
BTW the business that I am in today is DR/BC and Virtual Tape Appliance. My
z/Appliance device emulates FICON attached 3480, 3490 and 3590 tapes
f of
Paul Gorlinsky [p...@atsmigrations.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 9:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSPLEX / SYSNAME / SMFID stability
Hello Seymour,
The best thing to do is to turn this over to the lawyers. It is a breach of
contract and the vendor needs to be held a
Hello Seymour,
The best thing to do is to turn this over to the lawyers. It is a breach of
contract and the vendor needs to be held accountable.
I have done two DR tests in the past thirty days and several of the vendors
DONT require and immediately Key change. However, one vendor does and the
[IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Martin Packer [martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 4:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSPLEX / SYSNAME / SMFID stability
“Customers do the darnedest things…” 😊
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Ed
J
FYI, XCF does provide a "sysplex ID" that can be used to uniquely identify a
sysplex for the life of the sysplex. That could be used to distinguish between
two different sysplexes with the same name. A new sysplex ID is generated each
time the sysplex starts fresh.
---
“Customers do the darnedest things…” 😊
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Ed
Jaffe
Date: Thursday, 29 September 2022 at 22:57
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SYSPLEX / SYSNAME / SMFID stability
On 9/29/2022 5:19 AM, Mark A. Brooks wrote:
> Right, I&#x
On 9/29/2022 5:19 AM, Mark A. Brooks wrote:
Right, I'm not aware of a UUID for a z/OS system.
Every system in a given sysplex must have a unique name. In that sense
SysplexName.SystemName might do the trick. But ...
Sysplex names are not necessarily unique -- test sysplex or DR site could be
>
On Sep 29, 2022, at 8:19 AM, Mark A. Brooks wrote:
>
> Right, I'm not aware of a UUID for a z/OS system.
> Every system in a given sysplex must have a unique name. In that sense
> SysplexName.SystemName might do the trick. But ...
> Sysplex names are not necessarily unique -- test sysplex o
Right, I'm not aware of a UUID for a z/OS system.
Every system in a given sysplex must have a unique name. In that sense
SysplexName.SystemName might do the trick. But ...
Sysplex names are not necessarily unique -- test sysplex or DR site could be
using the same name.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Matt Hogstrom [m...@hogstrom.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 8:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SYSPLEX / SYSNAME / SMFID stability
We had an internal debate about the stability of SYSNAME
That’s a good question … I hope I used the term z/OS instance and not LPAR in
my question. A z/OS instance could be run on different CECs and LPARs at
different times.
There is no canonical UUID for an instance but I think there is likely an
industry best practice that could be relied upon.
M
If it moves to another machine is it still the same LPAR?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Matt Hogstrom
Date: Wednesday, 28 September 2022 at 13:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] SYSPLEX / SYSNAME / SMFID stability
We had an internal debate about the
We had an internal debate about the stability of SYSNAME and smfID in a
sysplex. The discussion was that smfID is not stable and can be changed and
that there can be more than one system in a sysplex with the same sysname /
smfid. I haven’t had a chance to try it out but the argument seems to
17 matches
Mail list logo
