All of us have to push back whenever we can
OK, add me to your spam list, but I posted this in response to a story about
the Secret Service's most recent transgressions (featuring a green screen):
Rachel, I've been watching you on MSNBC since before you had your own show.
When it comes to polit
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Grinsell, Don wrote:
> Scott, that's easy. They obviously want more money to modernize and they
> needed an easy scapegoat. I'd like to know more about how COBOL is
> inherently less secure than a modern language subject to the plague of
> hacks that beset the
rame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 4:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Setting the writers right
Charles,
I read the article, I said "what does COBOL have to
At least no one suggests it was a hanging chad.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Stevet wrote:
> We still see mainframes associated with old reel tapes and card sorters!! Not
> as bad as Manx but still.
>
> Annoys me enough to reply while in EU and paying for data by the MB.
>
> Sent from iPhone
We still see mainframes associated with old reel tapes and card sorters!! Not
as bad as Manx but still.
Annoys me enough to reply while in EU and paying for data by the MB.
Sent from iPhone - small keyboard fat fingers - expect spellinf errots.
> On Sep 27, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Charles Mills wr
nt: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Setting the writers right
Well that is what we call in the UK a load of BS.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Charles M
PMhack
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Setting the writers right
A recurring theme here the past couple of weeks has been t
ats federal agencies are experiencing, it's a
>> significant vulnerability."
>>
>> -- http://fedtechmagazine.com/OPMhack
>>
>> Charles
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) writes:
> "... the OPM is facing a huge problem with modernizing its security measures
> and tactics because of one acronym: COBOL. The programming language that
> rose to prominence in the 1960s is rampant throughout the OPM and with the
> advanced persistent threa
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> ] On Behalf Of Scott Ford
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:23 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Setting the writers right
>
> Charles,
>
> I read the article, I said "what does COBOL have to do
A.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Setting the writers right
Charles,
I read the article, I said "what does COBOL have to do with Security"?
Scott
On Saturday, September 26, 2015, Charles Mills wrote:
; -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> ] On
> Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:11 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Setting the writers right
>
> A recurring theme here the
t's a
significant vulnerability."
-- http://fedtechmagazine.com/OPMhack
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Sett
A recurring theme here the past couple of weeks has been the "head in the
1960's" writing about mainframes in news stories and now soap operas.
Seriously, would it make sense for our community to put together a volunteer
team (under the auspices of SHARE? Or ... ?) that would maintain a watch for
14 matches
Mail list logo
