Re: TCB reference following DETACH

2016-08-03 Thread Rupert Reynolds
I'm very rusty (as in MVS/ESA), but I'd say yes. I'd normally grab any info I want before DETACH. On 3 Aug 2016 9:10 p.m., "Charles Mills" wrote: > I am trying to shoot a problem. The code in question makes reference to a > TCB shortly after issuing a DETACH for that TCB. Am I

Re: TCB reference following DETACH

2016-08-03 Thread Charles Mills
Thanks. I figured ... Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Greg Dyck Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 4:41 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: TCB reference following DETACH On 8/3/2016 1:10 PM, Charles

Re: TCB reference following DETACH

2016-08-03 Thread Greg Dyck
On 8/3/2016 1:10 PM, Charles Mills wrote: I am trying to shoot a problem. The code in question makes reference to a TCB shortly after issuing a DETACH for that TCB. Am I correct in my analysis that that is a S0C4 candidate? That once you issue a DETACH, the TCB is no longer necessarily valid?

TCB reference following DETACH

2016-08-03 Thread Charles Mills
I am trying to shoot a problem. The code in question makes reference to a TCB shortly after issuing a DETACH for that TCB. Am I correct in my analysis that that is a S0C4 candidate? That once you issue a DETACH, the TCB is no longer necessarily valid? Thanks, Charles