Charles wrote:
>In the program API to SystemSSL?
Yes, GSK.
>If so that is how earlier similar version flags worked. Enable meant
enable,
>not require.
Thanks. That's the only sane way to do it, of course, but you never know
what someone will have thought was the Right Approach!
...phsiii
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TLS 1.3 support
For IBM, really: if we turn on the GSK flag that says "Enable TLSv1.3", and
someone runs the cold on an older z/OS that doesn't support TLS 1.3, it
won't throw an error, right? I'm pretty sure I remember this from previou
For IBM, really: if we turn on the GSK flag that says "Enable TLSv1.3", and
someone runs the cold on an older z/OS that doesn't support TLS 1.3, it
won't throw an error, right? I'm pretty sure I remember this from previous
TLS upgrades but wanted to be sure. If so, that's GOOD design, thank you!
