Given the small number of responses, I doubt that spending much time
"cleaning up" TSSO would be "cost effective". So I'm just going to put in
the IEFPRMLB processing to enhance the finding of TSSO's configuration
member and let it go at that.
--
I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anyt
TSSO
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Nims,Alva John (Al)
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 10:42 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: TSSO vs. System REXX for a "new us
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
> John,
>
> Has TSSO been updated to keep up with z/OS? In the past we were using it,
> but at the time the console restructure effectively 'broke' it in approx
> z/OS 1.11 or perhaps 1.13?
>
​Well, I can say that release 4.3 (which is curr
John,
Has TSSO been updated to keep up with z/OS? In the past we were using it, but
at the time the console restructure effectively 'broke' it in approx z/OS 1.11
or perhaps 1.13?
Dana
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:33:22 -0600, John McKown
wrote:
>
>There is also
>the venerable TSSO system which
) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 12:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TSSO vs. System REXX for a "new user who is poor".
I don't really know if that
I don't really know if that is a good subject line or not. And it, for
once, does not apply to my company, we use CA-OPS/MVS and like it.
There is an MPFLST program out there, MPF2REXX, which can be used with the
MPFLST (natch!) to run System REXX for automation purposes. There is also
the venerab
