From: Mark Zelden
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:34:54 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> See if you
, 2017 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:34:54 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
wrote:
>>
>> See if you have APAR OA51343 and prereq
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:34:54 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
wrote:
>>
>> See if you have APAR OA51343 and prereq's installed.
>> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?crawler=1&uid=isg1O
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Mark Zelden
> Sent: 06 April, 2017 16:58
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017
Correct, but that is not the cause in this situation.
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: 06 April, 2017 16:51
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Unexpla
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:08:25 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>We sometimes experience long delays in job initiation, which I cannot explain.
>It concerns a WLM managed jobclass, which is filled by Control-M. Every now
>and then, we see e.g. 4 jobs running and an accumulati
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:08:25 +, Vernooij, Kees wrote:
>So the number of running job is fully determined by WLM and I am trying to
>find out why WLM does not start more initiators.
Not quite. It can also be limited by JOBCLASS XEQCount and XEQMEMBER
--
Tom Marchant
-
nt: 06 April, 2017 15:28
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
>
> Need to ask. Did you go to the JC screen in SDSF to see if the JCLim
> column is an * or is it set to 4 for the jobclass in question?
>
>
> Thanks..
>
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 8:08 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
>
> Hello,
>
> We sometimes experience lo
t; To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
>
> Look for the "happy system" syndrome.
>
> I.e. the system is meeting it's SLA targets, so WLM feels no need to
> start additional initiators. This will most likely require nea
Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 07:08
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
Hello,
We sometimes experience long delays in job initiation, which I cannot explain.
It concerns a WLM managed jobclass, which is filled by
(ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 8:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
Hello,
We sometimes experience long delays in job initiation, which I cannot explain.
It concerns a WLM managed jobclass, which is filled by Control-M. Every
Look for the "happy system" syndrome.
I.e. the system is meeting it's SLA targets, so WLM feels no need to start
additional initiators. This will most likely require near real-time IEHIBALL
activity.
Adjusting the Service Class Goals may help.
Also turn on SMF 99's and ask IBM for their opinion
Hello,
We sometimes experience long delays in job initiation, which I cannot explain.
It concerns a WLM managed jobclass, which is filled by Control-M. Every now and
then, we see e.g. 4 jobs running and an accumulating number of jobs in the
input queue, up to more than 100, waiting for one or m
14 matches
Mail list logo
