Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-31 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2016-12-31, at 09:54, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > Sorry for not following this thread properly. I don't know why OP wants a PDS > dataset. Nothing wrong with that; it just puts the user in charge of getting > the right attributes. > > Suggestion: Use XDC to create a brand new sequential

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-31 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of venkat kulkarni Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 10:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: Xdc output print Hello All, Sorry for delay. I think

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-30 Thread venkat kulkarni
ussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> wrote on > 12/29/2016 01:01:11 PM: > > > From: Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Date: 12/29/2016 01:02 PM > > Subject: Re: Xdc output print > &

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Doug
ks, Kolusu IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> wrote on 12/29/2016 01:01:11 PM: > From: Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 12/29/2016 01:02 PM > Subject: Re: Xdc output print > Sent b

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Sri h Kolusu
o: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 12/29/2016 01:02 PM > Subject: Re: Xdc output print > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > > On 2016-12-29, at 12:12, Gibney, Dave wrote: > > > Stop specifying blksize. For that matter, don't speci

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2016-12-29, at 12:12, Gibney, Dave wrote: > Stop specifying blksize. For that matter, don't specify LRECL or RECFM > either, SDSF knows from JES. > XDC to a new SEQUENTIAL file. > Errr... If I omit SPACE, RECFM, or LRECL, SDSF complains about Invalid Value. If I specify VB, it allows one

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Gibney, Dave
December 29, 2016 6:51 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Xdc output print > > Yes, I tried with VB as record format snd then to 1024 as lrecl and 1024 in > block size and I tried fb with 240 lrecl and blksize with 3120 but still same > issue > > On Dec 29, 20

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:00:16 +0100, Gonzalo Cengotita wrote: > >Is a PDS previously created?. Iif the PDS already exists, you can`t change >the lrecl. It only can be done in a new PDS > Would it were so. Many a novice has corrupted a PDS by changing attributes in JCL. I believe PDSE finally

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Lizette Koehler
tte > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 8:08 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Xdc output print > > One other option I forgo

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Lizette Koehler
U > Subject: Re: Xdc output print > > I am placing my same reply from PRINT ISSUE in this one. This looks to be the > same issue as that thread: PRINT ISSUE > > When you get it to the PC how are you printing it? > > What printer hardware are you using? > > Is

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Lizette Koehler
ay, December 29, 2016 8:00 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Xdc output print > > Hi, > > Is a PDS previously created?. Iif the PDS already exists, you can`t change the > lrecl. It only can be done in a new PDS > > Regards > > > *Gonzalo C

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Gonzalo Cengotita
Hi, Is a PDS previously created?. Iif the PDS already exists, you can`t change the lrecl. It only can be done in a new PDS Regards *Gonzalo Cengotita* 2016-12-29 15:46 GMT+01:00 venkat kulkarni : > Hello Group, > > We have big lengthy report in sdsf and I was

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Carmen Vitullo
t; To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 8:51:06 AM Subject: Re: Xdc output print Yes, I tried with VB as record format snd then to 1024 as lrecl and 1024 in block size and I tried fb with 240 lrecl and blksize with 3120 but still same issue On Dec 29, 2016 17:49

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread venkat kulkarni
RSCB2H > p 616.653.8429 > f 616.653.2717 > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of venkat kulkarni > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 9:47 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Xdc output print >

Re: Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread Jousma, David
  49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of venkat kulkarni Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 9:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Xdc output print Hello Group, We have big

Xdc output print

2016-12-29 Thread venkat kulkarni
Hello Group, We have big lengthy report in sdsf and I was trying xdc to save report into PDs member.but the data from right side in truncated. I am unable to fix this issue. Do we have any restriction on using record length size in PDs or any parameter which can help me resolving this issue.