In an attempt to not hijack the thread I'm changing the subject line. Do you
have some significant differences in your compile or link parms between COBOL 4
and COBOL 5? What would be accounting for the rather significant load module
size growth between 4 and 5?
Rex
-Original
Compiler has Arrived!)
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 1:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: object/load module sizes - was RE
Oversimplifying only a little, program objects are almost always a bit
bigger than the corresponding load modules, and they can
bedramaticallyb so when significant blocks of storage are initialized
with constants.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
, October 02, 2014 2:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: object/load module sizes - was RE: Enterprise COBOL v5.1
Implemented?
Oversimplifying only a little, program objects are almost always a bit bigger
than the corresponding load modules, and they can bedramaticallyb so when
significant
