On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:30:42 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
>Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs.
Chuck Norris doesn't need a a Web App to apply PTFs, he just roundhouse kicks
them in.
Art Gutowski
General Motors, LLC
arthur.gutow...@g
HI Terri,
I'm happy you finally got the server up, but sorry to see that you aren't happy
with the new format of the upgrade materials for z/OS! If you'd like, please
email me your entire list, and we can work through them. Some pieces might be
fixed by changing the content of the Upgrade Work
-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage
External Email
Hi Terri,
You re
Hi Terri,
You re-ran IZUSETUP, not recently right? That was made obsolete way back on
z/OS V2.1 with APAR PI54286 (2016), to move to the "modern" parmlib (IZUPRMxx)
method. I hope you still aren't using that, and don't have the server running
on your z/OS V2.1 system but rather on a higher sys
-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 8:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage
External Email
On 3/26/2020 5
On 3/26/2020 5:45 PM, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
It then immediately fails stating z/OSMF cant talk to the 2.1 lpar, because
there is no IP address under the SYSTEM tab in z/OSMF.
What do you see when you open the Systems tab? Do you see an entry for
all 5 of your sysplex members, including your z
So I have a few questions I was wondering if someone can explain to me?
We are a software development company that have 5 lpars in a SYSPLEX. 1 - z/OS
2.3 , 3 - z/OS 2.2 and 1 - z/OS 2.1, because of developers.
Yes I know the 2.1 is unsupported and this is where my questions start.
I have ins
