Site written software would the company written application unique to
their site and data, vs something bought from an outside company.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:27 PM kekronbekron
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Hey, what do you mean by site written software?
>
> Would
Hey, what do you mean by site written software?
Would this apply even if I get zPDT LE with my personal email?
Is it so because they'll verify that I have the pre-req (of relevant MF
experience)?
- KB
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, March 29th, 2022 at 9:44 AM, Mike Schwab
wrote
If you are doing any coding to learn, that is going to be OK.
If you happen to code anything that is useful to run on your
employer's mainframe, it probably won't be detected since it would
fall under site written software.
If you try to sell to any non-employer company they are probably going
to
On 3/27/22 10:11 PM, Brian Westerman wrote:
I think you could probably learn "how" to make your product on the LE
edition and if things start working out for you and you think you might
have a viable product, you could then switch to the personal edition.
That seems like you could potentially
I think you could probably learn "how" to make your product on the LE edition
and if things start working out for you and you think you might have a viable
product, you could then switch to the personal edition. I don't think you are
locked into anything by starting with the LE edition. Many p
t; Edition, but the long standing Personal Edition. Obviously I was
>>>> wrong.
>>> Joseph's question/comment was:
>>>
>>>
>>> Why do I have to pay so much money
>>> When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
>>>
ent. That might be a good starting
point.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 8:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/PDT
IMHO, a justifiable fear of size
Peter Farley wrote, in part:
>IMHO, a justifiable fear of size and ferocity of the legal army at IBM
should provide the needed incentive to DTRT for most above-board Learners
Edition users
As an early manager once told me, "IBM's lawyers can beat up our lawyers",
so yeah. An
>> commented on, is not the "nobody actually has it yet" Learner's
>>>> Edition, but the long standing Personal Edition. Obviously I was
>>>> wrong.
>>> Joseph's question/comment was:
>>>
>>>
>>> Why do I have to pay s
UA.EDU] on behalf of
Radoslaw Skorupka [r.skoru...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2022 10:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/PDT
Well, how can it be enforced?
Let's assume someone is working on some software, called XYZ. He's
working on zPDT emulated machine.
Fin
t I
>>>> commented on, is not the "nobody actually has it yet" Learner's
>>>> Edition, but the long standing Personal Edition. Obviously I was
>>>> wrong.
>>> Joseph's question/comment was:
>>>
>>>
>>> Why do I hav
ion, but the long standing Personal Edition. Obviously I was
wrong.
Joseph's question/comment was:
Why do I have to pay so much money
When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal edition and can
sell software you develo
ve to pay so much money
>>>>> When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
>>>>>
>>>>> And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal edition
>>>>> and can sell software you develop
>>> I doubt th
e long standing Personal Edition. Obviously I was
> > wrong.
>
> Joseph's question/comment was:
>
>
> Why do I have to pay so much money
> When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
>
> And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal edi
t" Learner's
>> Edition, but the long standing Personal Edition. Obviously I was
>> wrong.
>
> Joseph's question/comment was:
>
>
> Why do I have to pay so much money
> When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
>
> And they responded
:
Why do I have to pay so much money
When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal edition and can
sell software you develop
If so what makes me different than an ISV
So, the "why" of the difference in cost betwee
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 11:05, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>
> On 3/25/2022 7:52 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
[...]
> > I doubt that the personal edition licence prohibits you from selling
> > software that you develop. But even if I am wrong on that...
>
> It most certainly does!!! Commercial use of any kind is pr
wrote:
>>>
>>> At the time of my re-newel I asked my rep
>>> Why do I have to pay so much money
>>> When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
>>>
>>> And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal edition and
re, reputation merely what others think you are.” - - - John Wooden
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jay
Maynard
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 09:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/PDT
Actually, the z/PDTLE license *does* prohibit using
On 3/25/2022 7:52 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 07:33, Joseph Reichman wrote:
At the time of my re-newel I asked my rep
Why do I have to pay so much money
When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal
o much money
> > When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
> >
> > And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal edition
> and can sell software you develop
>
> I doubt that the personal edition licence prohibits you from selling
> softwa
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 07:33, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> At the time of my re-newel I asked my rep
> Why do I have to pay so much money
> When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
>
> And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal edition and
> can
Since you responded to my post maybe you
Can answer a question
At the time of my re-newel I asked my rep
Why do I have to pay so much money
When the learners edition is only a few hundred dollars
And they responded well that’s because you have z/PDT personal edition and can
sell software
Dallas - ISV which means zPDT and tends to get the ADCD a bit quicker
Passport Advantage - means ZD&T systems and this ADCD is packaged slightly
differently. In fact an ISV wouldn't be able to use it and vice-versa
Sebastian
>Just opened a ticket was told will get a response by tommorow
>
>Tha
Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 9:21 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/PDT
>
> Just logged in to passport advantage went to down load software Still 2.4
>
> John if I understand you it was explained to me that there are 2 Zpdt
> perso
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 9:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/PDT
Just logged in to passport advantage went to down load software Still 2.4
John if I understand you it was explained to me that there are 2
tion,
> interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 9:01 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.ED
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 9:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/PDT
John
Think we have different licenses I typically download the images from the
passport advantage site
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 8:47 AM, John Ab
such corruption,
> interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 8:20 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/PDT
On another note still waiting for 2.5 anybody hear anything
> On Mar 23, 2022, at 1:33 AM, Jay Maynard wrote:
>
> I have completed all of the paperwork and paid my money. The last I
> heard, the log4j business was indeed soaking up all of the bandwidth
27;m hoping they extend it.
>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:41 PM Grant Taylor <
>> 023065957af1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/22/22 10:37 PM, Brian Westerman wrote:
>>> Has anyone heard any news about the lower cost z/PDT late
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/PDT
I have completed all of the paperwork and paid my money. The last I heard, the
log4j business was indeed soaking up all of the bandwidth they had to devote to
such things, but they expected to have something to send out by mid-February,
and everything
I'm told that the z/PDT Learner's Edition is not just the 2.5 AD/CD, but
has other goodies on it as well. It also isn't quite the same as the
commercial version, thoughI don't know what the differences are - but if
you look at the z/PDT web page, you'll see that the late
d receive
> emails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption,
> interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jay Ma
any consequence thereof.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jay Maynard
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 1:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/PDT
I have completed all of the paperwork and paid my money
M, Brian Westerman wrote:
> > Has anyone heard any news about the lower cost z/PDT lately? I was
> > on the list, but everything seems to have been dropped.
>
> I heard from someone that they had completed the paperwork and were
> waiting on the approval as of early this y
On 3/22/22 10:37 PM, Brian Westerman wrote:
Has anyone heard any news about the lower cost z/PDT lately? I was
on the list, but everything seems to have been dropped.
I heard from someone that they had completed the paperwork and were
waiting on the approval as of early this year. From what
Has anyone heard any news about the lower cost z/PDT lately? I was on the
list, but everything seems to have been dropped.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
Thanks all for your help. Happy ending: sometime between when last we
checked and now, the z/PDT in question has been upgraded to a "BC12."
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Friday, F
>And there are other hardware features that are NOT implemented, which I
>found out the hard way. No AUTOIPL, for instance.
z/OS AUTOIPL uses a Diagnose (which is implemented by LPAR and z/VM)
to initiate an IPL. I think it is not currently implemented by zPDT.
However,
if you run z/OS as a
> However, keep in mind that this is a statement about the CPU
>architecture, and not
>the I/O architecture. For example, zPDT does not support MIDAWs, which
>were
>introduced on the z9 machines.
And there are other hardware features that are NOT implemented, which I found
out the hard way
No charge for the upgrade. They get it from ResourceLink, have them look
under the Tools option and 1090 Support.
From: Charles Mills
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 02/23/2017 01:23 PM
Subject:Re: How determine effective architecture level of a z/PDT?
Sent by
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How determine effective architecture level of a z/PDT?
Charles, this link might help:
https://www-356.ibm.com/partnerworld/wps/servlet/ContentHandler/pw_com_zpdt_
whatsnew
It has a history of releases back to 2010.
From: Charles Mills
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
architecture level of a z/PDT?
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
@Jim, my concern at this moment is with C++ compile ARCH level, so I/O
macht
nichts.
@Steve, the Redbook says E39 is z800/900, and I am confident of my mapping
of z900 to ARCH(5) -- assuming it is running in Z mode, not
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Steve M Bohn
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 9:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How determine effective architecture level of a z/PDT?
Correct, enter it in a Linux Terminal session.
And I don't
vels but note Mr.
Bohns observation previously in this thread.
Hope this helps!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve M Bohn
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 9:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How determine
level of a z/PDT?
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thanks.
And I gather that's a Linux command, not a "z/OS" command.
And working from the Redbook, the output below would indicate an E39, an
emulated z800/900, ARCH(5) or ZS, right?
Charles
-Original Message
/Cincinnati/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 02/23/2017 10:35:15 AM:
> From: Steve M Bohn/Cincinnati/IBM@IBMUS
> To: ibm-main@listserv.ua.edu
> Date: 02/23/2017 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: How determine effective architecture level of a z/PDT?
>
> Charles, the architecture level is fixed at the zP
SERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Steve M Bohn
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How determine effective architecture level of a z/PDT?
Have them send you the output of the z1090ver command:
$ z1090ver
z1090, version z1090_v1r0_E39, build date - 10/17/08 SUSE
Have them send you the output of the z1090ver command:
$ z1090ver
z1090, version z1090_v1r0_E39, build date - 10/17/08 SUSE 32 bit
From: Charles Mills
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 02/23/2017 11:28 AM
Subject:Re: How determine effective architecture level of a z/PDT
Bohn
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How determine effective architecture level of a z/PDT?
Charles, the architecture level is fixed at the zPDT's release level. For
example: zPDT V1R6 runs the z13 architecture level.
From: Charle
Charles, the architecture level is fixed at the zPDT's release level. For
example: zPDT V1R6 runs the z13 architecture level.
From: Charles Mills
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 02/23/2017 09:44 AM
Subject:How determine effective architecture level of a z/PDT?
Se
Do I understand correctly? All z/PDT's return z1090 or z1091 for D M=CPU?
How can one determine the effective architecture level? Is it pretending to
be a z9 or a BC12?
(On a customer machine. I know that possible general answers are "write a
program to query the facility bits" or "use a CBT tool
53 matches
Mail list logo
