And while you're at it, repeal the law of gravity, so that I don't have
to worry about weight gain from eating too much 'chocolate chocolate
chip' ice cream.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: July 14, 2006 12:26
> Repeal the law of simultaneity! Matter should be free to exist in
> multiple places at the same time! Free the bound variables!
>
> -- db
Open Source Reality? A think of the possibilities!
___
James Vincent
Systems Engineering Consultant
Nationwide
> > > "There can only be one."
> >
> > (sigh) "There can be only one."
> >
> > Alan
>
> Now that reminds me of Mr Gilmore's postings on the Assembler list.
> Please explain the difference for the gramatically challenged?
The first is an exclusionary statement -- only one CAN exist. The second
is
On Jul 14, 2006, at 6:28 AM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
For $25, you can get a signed Certificate of Authenticity and a
publicity
photo!
It's great! The photo makes a terrific dart board as well as
scaring small
children.
*SMALL*?
I use it as bear repellent.
Adam
Greetings,
I would like to create a very large FBA disk (about 3,000,000 FBA 512
blocks) on a FLEX system with z/VM 4.3 to accommodate a z/VSE 3.1
system residence volume. However it appears that there is an
artificial or real limit in the DIRECTXA command since I get the
following error mess
The problem is not grammatical; it is that the reference is to a quote from a
movie -- "Highlander," maybe? -- and Alan posted the corrected quote.
Jon
> On Friday, 07/14/2006 at 09:56 AST, Nick Laflamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Adam Thornton wrote:
> > > On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:43
DUMPRX was one of the slickest tools available for VM sysprogs in the
'80s. With the overall level of code quality at that time, it was really
needed. I have always thought that the only reason it wasn't included in
the product was the NIH mentality that was common in IBM at that time in
Endi
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:45:55 -0400, Bill Bitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Brian, when you say 'relative performance metrics' are you asking about
>the CPU cost associated with the various paths? If so, I don't think
>I have any current data on that. Partly because, it does depend on a lot
>of
...need to see your Curriculum Vitae before making my final decision!
-Original Message-
From: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:07 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: OT: Name licensing
Importance: Low
On Friday, 07/14/2006 at 01:08
On 14 Jul 2006 at 10:10, Alan Altmark wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 07/14/2006 at 09:56 AST, Nick Laflamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Adam Thornton wrote:
> > > On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> > >> Alan Altmark
> > >> Lead Security Weasel
> > >
> > > David? Can that be *my* jo
On Friday, 07/14/2006 at 09:56 AST, Nick Laflamme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Thornton wrote:
> > On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> >> Alan Altmark
> >> Lead Security Weasel
> >
> > David? Can that be *my* job title?
>
> "There can only be one."
(sigh) "There can be only
Adam Thornton wrote:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
Alan Altmark
Lead Security Weasel
David? Can that be *my* job title?
"There can only be one."
> For $25, you can get a signed Certificate of Authenticity and a publicity
photo!
It's great! The photo makes a terrific dart board as well as scaring small
children.
On Friday, 07/14/2006 at 01:08 AST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> (Actually, that Altmark part really isn't all that bad. I mean, you can
> get Alan Altmark action figures if you're really REALLY nice to Dame
> Pam. Collect your set of VM Developer Action Figures today! Complete
> with
Brian, when you say 'relative performance metrics' are you asking about
the CPU cost associated with the various paths? If so, I don't think
I have any current data on that. Partly because, it does depend on a lot
of different things. My suggestion there is to find a virtual machine
that is fairly
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Tim Shoppa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
>> as a result "ascii" arriving in the mainframe memory from a 2702
>> (linescanner) was "bit-reversed" ... and the ibm translate tables were
>> taking that into account.
>
>Vaguely related: when
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:08:36 -0400 David Boyes said:
>> On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
>> > Alan Altmark
>> > Lead Security Weasel
>>
>> David? Can that be *my* job title? Not the "Alan Altmark" part.
>Only if you agree to permanently move to Poughkeepsie and give up all
You ma
You guys missed mentioning a HUGE marketing opportunity! This action
figure already comes with a well established alter ago! CHUCKIE!
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Thornton
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 1:1
18 matches
Mail list logo
