Re: RACF for VM default

2007-05-25 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 25, 2007, at 9:40 PM, Jim Bohnsack wrote: That's almost the question. What should be the shipment default? DES encryption or the prior hash format? There is no question that it should be able to support the previous type of encryption. My contention is that most shops use DES enc

Re: RACF for VM default

2007-05-25 Thread Jim Bohnsack
That's almost the question. What should be the shipment default? DES encryption or the prior hash format? There is no question that it should be able to support the previous type of encryption. My contention is that most shops use DES encryption and the default should be DES. I certainly t

Re: RACF for VM default

2007-05-25 Thread Thomas Kern
It should be shipped with AES encryption as the default with DES and this exit as options. There should, of course, be large warnings about what defaults/options may be incompatible with prior releases of the product. It would be nice if the product could sense if the current settings are incompa

Re: RACF for VM default

2007-05-25 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 05/25/2007 at 01:20 AST, Jim Bohnsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd be interested in a show of hands to find out if others prefer to and > do roll your own for database password encryption vs. using RACF's DES > code. I told the RACF developer that I'd let him know what I found. I

Re: RACF for VM default

2007-05-25 Thread David Boyes
> It seems to me that it > should be made an option rather than having someone (me) read and > decipher the note in the program directory and then ignore it. Leaving > the exit in place rather than using RACF's DES encryption means that if > you use your existing DES encrypted database, no existing

Re: RACF for VM default

2007-05-25 Thread Thomas Kern
The exit should not be the default or even readily available without some positive action by the install person. That said, we might have to use that exit to implement an AES encryption of the passwords, if we do start the migration to RACF. /Tom Kern On Fri, 25 May 2007 13:20:11 -0400, Jim B

RACF for VM default

2007-05-25 Thread Jim Bohnsack
I'm installing z/VM 5.2 on a 2nd level test system while waiting for 5.3 to become available. I stumbled (stubbed my toe) over a default in the RACF install and am curious to get some other's views on whether or not this should be the default. In talking with a RACF developer, he said that th

IBM System p and System z Lead in Worldwide Revenue Share for $250k+ Servers

2007-05-25 Thread Dave Jones
According to IDC, IBM's leadership position in global server revenue in 2006 was augmented by noteworthy 11.7 percent year-over-year revenue growth in its System z mainframe business, and 29.1 percent factory revenue share in the quarter. (2) http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21591.w

Re: IPL without OPERATOR on console

2007-05-25 Thread Berry van Sleeuwen
Based on your comment I guess either the operator did not specify a loadparm, even when he was instructed to do so, or the loadparm was not recognized for some reason. Hm, well, I can't guess what is would be. Nex t IPL we can look into it. I did some testing with a guest VM. IPL with known co