I will be out of the office starting 04/07/2008 and will not return until
04/13/2008.
I am out of the office until April 14. I will have no email access and no
telephone or voice maile access during this time.
__
This email may contain c
>>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:14 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alan Ackerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> People here won't give me a cost number for the software "because we have=
> an enterprise license".
Then ask them for the cost of the enterprise license. Theoretically you
w
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:45:09 -0400, Said, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Our management came up with:
>Per MIP Cost Analysis
>EnvironmentOnetime Ongoing
>z/OS $7,300 $1,980
>z/Linux$447$61
>
>Of course, this does not include the cost of any Velocity S
On Sunday, 04/06/2008 at 01:53 EDT, Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the default for this new function going to be "enabled" or
"disabled?"
In order to maintain compatibility, port isolation is disabled by default.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
>>> On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:25 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alan
Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [cross-posted to IBMVM and LINUX-390]
>
> I just want to bring to everyone's attention some new support for the
> Virtual Switch. APAR VM64281 for z/VM 5.3 (only) provides a "port
> i
[cross-posted to IBMVM and LINUX-390]
I just want to bring to everyone's attention some new support for the
Virtual Switch. APAR VM64281 for z/VM 5.3 (only) provides a "port
isolation" function that prevents guests on the same VSWITCH or VLAN (if
the VSWITCH is VLAN-aware) from talking directl
