>>> my new answer is "How many rocks can you carry?" ;)
LOL!
Jim Hughes
603-271-5586
"It is fun to do the impossible."
==>-Original Message-
==>From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]
On
==>Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
==>Sent: Tuesday, Novembe
Good point, Jim. Multiple JVM's per server make for chubbier servers.
We once had 100 on a z9 with 2 IFLs (dev/test)
Given that, a 54 way z9 could run 2700 of those, perhaps?? Maybe?
We now have about 200 on 34 IFLs (mostly z10 EC).
Obviously all servers are not created equal...
When I get as
If all you really want to know is if there are any > 1000, then that's
okay. But servers are not equal. One shop may have 800 servers and they
may be user sandboxes or Apache servers. Another may "only" have 556
servers but they support over 2600 jvms and http instances. The
characteristics of
>>> On 11/17/2009 at 2:53 PM, August Carideo wrote:
> those running LINUX guest's - how many are you running
> Is anyone running any where near a 1000, there was a post on the Z/os list
> regarding
For a while, the Community Development System for Linux had around 800 or so.
Marist College ha
556 on two z/10s, 184 in production and 372 dev/test.
-- R; <><
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 14:53, August Carideo wrote:
> those running LINUX guest's - how many are you running
> Is anyone running any where near a 1000, there was a post on the Z/os list
> regarding
> thanks,
> Augie
>
those running LINUX guest's - how many are you running
Is anyone running any where near a 1000, there was a post on the Z/os list
regarding
thanks,
Augie
On Tuesday, 11/17/2009 at 03:45 EST, Rob van der Heij
wrote:
> I stand corrected. CP is not able to detect a program check in the
> handler other than an invalid new PSW. If it's not wiped out, the my
> bet would be on a BC-mode PSW. If CP D PSW ALL does not show you, a
> TRACE PROG should.
As i
I would like thank everyone for the informative responses. I am in the
process of implementing Dirmaint, and will begin researching CSE
requirements.
Bob
No, I do not use MAINT CF1 for my production system; the Parm disk hasn't moved
in years. It was even over-allocated so that it would not need to be moved
because of space problems.I specified the MODULE parameter on the SHUTDOWN
REIPL command. That is when I learned about that handy parameter.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 10:09 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM SHUTDOWN RE_IPL
Wasn't it that you moved MAINT CF1 an
No, VM:Account needs a R/O link only. It does not do direct updating of the
object directory. It just needs to be able to read it.
Yvonne
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 4:34 P
Hi Dave,
Is that read-only link to the 540RES defined as VMACCT’s 1A0?
Is there a DIRECT 1A0 record in the VMACCT CONFIG file on it’s 191 disk that
has the correct volume label?
Does the link cover the full pack including cylinder 0? This is where we see
the most problems in this area
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> Sorry. I thought I knew what you meant. :-) A program interrupt loop is
> detected when there is a program check and the current PSW is the "same"
> as the Program New PSW. This indicates that there is something wrong with
> Program New P
13 matches
Mail list logo
