I am out of the office until 06/10/2010.
I will respond to your message when I return as I will not be checking my
mail while I am away. If your note needs immediate attention you can try
to contact my backups. For VMSES/E and z/VM Installation support try
Susan Baloga or Mark Blackwell (or
Hi,
q disk
LABEL VDEV M STAT CYL TYPE BLKSZ FILES BLKS USED-(%) BLKS LEFT BL
K TOTAL
OWN191 191 A R/W 100 3390 4096 315 4296-24 13704
18000
DFS1B5 001 B R/O50 3390 4096 142 7988-89 1012
9000
TCM592 002 C R/O56 3390 4096
I'd say you should open a PMR. VMLINK shouldn't cause a fatal error
to CMS by detaching the 190. It seems to know enough that a simple
VMLINK MAINT 190 does access 190 as a new filemode, but when you
specify those linking options, it detached the 190.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Alain
I agree.
The DMSACC048E Invalid filemode S makes since since 190 is a system disk,
but don't like the fact
that it is gone when VMLINK finishes.
Marci Beach
From:
Bruce Hayden bjhay...@gmail.com
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
06/09/2010 08:10 AM
Subject:
Re: VMLINK
Does not work that way here:
q search
MNT191 191 AR/W
MNT5E5 5E5 BR/W
- DIR CR/W VMSYSA:MAINT.CONFIG
MNT51D 51D DR/W
MNT190
Yup you are right. This was fixed in a recent APAR VM64809.
This is for z/VM Version 5 Release 3.0,
z/VM Version 5 Release 4.0 and z/VM Version 6 Release 1.0
Marci Beach
From:
Frank M. Ramaekers framaek...@ailife.com
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
06/09/2010 08:58 AM
Ok I take that back. Even with the APAR I mentioned applied on our system
here,
we still see the problem.
I guess a PMR is in order still.
Marci Beach
From:
Frank M. Ramaekers framaek...@ailife.com
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
06/09/2010 08:58 AM
Subject:
Re: VMLINK
Not that it matters much since IBM will need to resolve it for every
release and RSU, but it happens here for:
z/VM 5.4.0 CP service level 0901 and 1001, with CMS Level 24 at service
level 901 and 001
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my
Really? I'm surprised that it fails in 0901 and 1001 but not in 0903?
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:
Could you issue a: LISTFILE VMLINK * * (ISO
and: EXECMAP VMLINK
right before issuing (again) that: vmlink maint 190 +1 a-z rr (type
That would ensure that you have no other VMLINK EXEC somewhere in your
search order,
I, too, am surprised that it would not be just as broken at 0903 as it is
Surprised, especially since my VMLINK EXEC is dated 2008-06-10:
LISTFILE VMLINK EXEC * (ISO
FILENAME FILETYPE FM FORMAT LRECL RECS BLOCKS DATE
TIME
VMLINK EXEC S2 F 1024304 76 2008-06-10
09:41:15
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 09:49:23
execmap vmlink
Name
An FYI from a z/VM 6.1 1002 system.
listf vmlink * * (iso
FILENAME FILETYPE FM FORMAT LRECL RECS BLOCKS DATE TIME
VMLINK EXEC S2 F 1024304 76 2009-03-22 16:04:36
VMLINK SEXECS2 V130 4114 42 2009-03-20 14:17:09
Ready;
q cmslevel
CMS Level 24, Service Level 901
l vmlink exec * (Iso
FILENAME FILETYPE FM FORMAT LRECL RECS BLOCKS DATE TIME
VMLINK EXEC S2 F 1024304 76 2008-06-10
09:41:15
So at SLU 901 we're running the same VMLINK EXEC as you at your SLU
On Tuesday, 06/08/2010 at 11:11 EDT, Michael Coffin
michaelcof...@mccci.com wrote:
NIST SP 800-53 Control: The information system automatically terminates
a
session after 15 minutes of inactivity.
We argued that, in it?s literal sense, Session Termination means forcing
the
z/VM virtual
Why would you argue that session means server? When you ssh into a
server and terminate the ssh session after 15 minutes of activity, do you
terminate the server? You do not. All you are terminating is the ssh
session. Look at all uses of the word session in 800-53; none of them
could
Can someone tell me how many SFS blocks there are per 3390-3 cylinder? I have
a user wanting the equivalent of 300 cylinders of SFS Directory space.
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer|| Infocrossing, a Wipro Company || 11707 Miracle
Hills Drive, Omaha, NE,
Can someone tell me how many SFS blocks there are per 3390-3 cylinder? I have
a user wanting the equivalent of 300 cylinders of SFS Directory space.
Scott,
There are 180 4k-blocks per 3390 cylinder (any size 3390). SFS uses 4k blocks.
Thanks Dennis
Thank you,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 1:40 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS Blocks to Cylinders
Can someone tell me how many
My concern about the requirement to run an anti-virus type program on z/VM is
not that we
don't need one, but that we don't have one to run. We do run a z/VM-CMS based
webserver
and with it we deliver binary files to end-users. Yes, this can and will be
replaced by a
linux/x86 solution, but our
19 matches
Mail list logo
