Typo, Tony, --
You mean all in joust.
-- Sir Santa;
On 2010-08-02, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com wrote:
OH NO!
Knighthood has gone to their heads.
Now they are better than us and need their own sandbox to play in 'cause
they can't be bothered with us mere mortals.
(All in jest.)
I will be out of the office starting 08/03/2010 and will not return until
08/09/2010.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Tony -
Would you like to be the Court Jester?
/Fran
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:34:21 -0400 Tony Thigpen said:
OH NO!
Knighthood has gone to their heads.
Now they are better than us and need their own sandbox to play in 'cause
I have z/VSE 4.2.1 and z/VM 5.4. Back when I had VSE/ESA and VM/ESA,
some costs benefits could be gleaned from having similar products in
both OS's on the same physical machine. Products that come to mind are
High-level assembler, ACF/VTAM and possibly DITTO. Is this still true?
My first
Hi, Frank.
That sounds like a good question to ask your local IBM Business Partner;
they seem to have taken on the role once handled by the local IBM sale rep.
Have a good one.
On 08/03/2010 09:15 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
I have z/VSE 4.2.1 and z/VM 5.4. Back when I had VSE/ESA and
But, that would not get me the 'Sir' in front of my name. :-(
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Fran Hensler
Sent: 08/03/2010 07:58 AM
Tony -
Would you like to be the Court Jester?
/Fran
On Mon, 2
Isn't that court jouster?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Fran Hensler
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:58 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Looking for Knights of VM
Tony
Both terms are correct but they have different meanings..
A 'court jouster' is a warrior whereas a 'court jester' is a clown.
Since Tony had made his remarks is 'jest' I chose to use court jester.
/Fran
On Tue, 3 Aug
There are so many clowns on this list that I thought the reference must be to
something that was not in such abundance :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Fran Hensler
Sent: Tuesday,
Can anyone share their profile tcpip and dtcparms file to accomplish this two
stack setup? Can I share the same OSA address 9800-9802 or do I have to define
3 more? And any holes I am going to fall in?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
You can not share the same triplet, you will need another triplet. However,
I would suggest putting your stacks on a vswitch and giving the triplet to
the vswitch, then you can use the same virtual address on the two stacks.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Dean, David (I/S)
Also, if the VSwitch is participating in failover that capability is automatically
available to the TCP/IP stack.
On 08/03/2010 02:21 PM, Mark Pace wrote:
You can not share the same triplet, you will need another triplet. However, I would
suggest putting your stacks on a vswitch and giving
I know, I'm probably being stupid here, but I just can't seem to figure it
out.
Given something like:
K1 V1 K2 V2 K3 V3 K4 V4
I want to be able pipe that V3 to a VAR stage. But it needs to be
relative to where K3 is so that:
K3 V3 K1 V1 K2 V2 K4 V4
would find V3 as well.
Thanks,
Leland
Your input is a bit unclear to me. Are these K1 etc records? Or words in a
single record? And, what do you means with relative to wheer K3 is?
Maybe look at SPLIT and then maybe BETWEEN /K3/ V3/
2010/8/3 Leland Lucius lluc...@homerow.net
I know, I'm probably being stupid here, but I just
How about something like:
word(string,( wordpos('K3',string) + 1 ) )
On 08/03/2010 03:09 PM, Leland Lucius wrote:
I know, I'm probably being stupid here, but I just can't seem to figure it out.
Given something like:
K1 V1 K2 V2 K3 V3 K4 V4
I want to be able pipe that V3 to a VAR stage.
Like this?
pipe literal k1 v1 k2 v2 k3 v3 k4 v4|split at blank| Join 1 / /|find
k3|spec w2 1|console
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Leland Lucius
Sent: Tuesday, August 03,
Yes, it's still true. At least we have VTAM and DITTO on that condition.
Look at your software order. You need to order the product with it's VSE
product number. So for instance 5686-065 ACF-VTAM-VM-multidomain.
Regards, Berry.
Op 03-08-10 16:15, Frank M. Ramaekers schreef:
I have z/VSE 4.2.1
Hello Frank,
It seems to me that we had the Hi-Level Assembler like that and it was
changed by IBM back to two costs. I will check again.
Please let me know if you find out differently.
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-363-5050
ext 35050
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Sorry - I just use REXX:
/* */
Arg input
Parse VAR input . 'K3' gold .
If gold '' Then Say found' gold
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Leland Lucius lluc...@homerow.net wrote:
I know, I'm probably being stupid here, but I just can't seem to figure it
out.
Given something
Hello VM List.
I'm trying to get reporting operational for EREP data. At your shop what user
runs CPEREPXA to generate report?
I could use MAINT, but is this the way it's done or is there another user that
is preferred?
TIA,
Jon L.
That's works just dandy.
Thanks much,
Leland
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.com mailto:framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
Like this?
pipe literal k1 v1 k2 v2 k3 v3 k4 v4|split at blank| Join 1 / /|find
k3|spec w2 1|console
Hi
You may use the EREP ID but you needed to stop the EREP recording and link to
MAINT's 201 disk.
Martin
--- On Tue, 8/3/10, Lesseg, Jon jon.les...@pacificorp.com wrote:
From: Lesseg, Jon jon.les...@pacificorp.com
Subject: EREP Reporting
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: Tuesday, 3
22 matches
Mail list logo
