Re: (Fwd) Curiosity Question: System Security

2010-08-06 Thread Alan Altmark
> So if you connect a user to GROUP1B, they will have access to resources > permitted to GROUP1B, GROUP1, and SYS1. On second thought, no, that's not right. You still have to be CONNECTed to the permitted group. Duh. Permissions are not processed hierarchically. The hierarchy comes into p l

Re: (Fwd) Curiosity Question: System Security

2010-08-06 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 08/06/2010 at 10:22 EDT, "McKown, John" wrote: > RACF, at least on z/OS, does not allow a GROUP to be a member of a group.. A > RACF group can only contain RACF userids. Eg: > > AG GROUP1 > AG GROUP2 > ADDUSER USER1 > > You can do a CONNECT of USER1 to GROUP1 and GROUP2. But

Tom Burgess/Comag/HearstUK is out of the office.

2010-08-06 Thread Tom Burgess
I will be out of the office starting 07/08/2010 and will not return until 12/08/2010. I will respond to your message when I return. Company Name: Conde Nast and National Magazine Distributors Limited Registered Address: Unit 3, Tavistock Road, West Drayton, Middlesex UB7 7QE Registered in Engl

Re: pipe question?

2010-08-06 Thread Scott Rohling
It really depends on where you are going with all this... Taking your question literally: 'PIPE FILE GUESTS LIST A | DROP FIRST | > GUESTS LIST A' If your 'process' is within the PIPE then the answer will involve things like secondary streams, etc. The above simply removes the first line of a

pipe question?

2010-08-06 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Victor_Hugo_Ochoa?=
Please somebody can orient to me??? I have the next list in my file "guests list A" CMDACNTL CMDAUTO1 CMDCAL03 I want to take one x one the elements from the list and after it process, I want to erase it of the list for example Take CMDACNTL process this element and my new list (guest

Re: Standard label Defs.

2010-08-06 Thread Rich Greenberg
On: Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 03:52:08PM -0700,Schuh, Richard Wrote: } Thanks, Dale. The last time I needed it6, there was no DFSMS. Before DFSMS there was (and may still be) a book detailing disk and tape labels, also "in excruciating detail". -- Rich Greenberg Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign pani

Re: Standard label Defs.

2010-08-06 Thread Schuh, Richard
Thanks, Dale. The last time I needed it6, there was no DFSMS. Regards, Richard Schuh > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Dale R. Smith > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 3:21 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subje

Re: Standard label Defs.

2010-08-06 Thread Dale R. Smith
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:56:13 -0700, Schuh, Richard wrote : >Where do I find the format specifications of standard labels for tape? (No suggestions of office supply stores, please. After all, it is Friday. ) > > >Regards, >Richard Schuh > > It's documented in excruciating detail in "DFSMS: Using

Re: Xedit reserved line with unprotected field

2010-08-06 Thread Phil Smith III
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Les Koehler wrote: >Do I recall correctly that in order to use an unprotected field in a reserved >line, the macro has to issue a READ ALL so that Xedit will honor the control >characters? >I've been playing with trying to do something like that with THE on my pc

Standard label Defs.

2010-08-06 Thread Schuh, Richard
Where do I find the format specifications of standard labels for tape? (No suggestions of office supply stores, please. After all, it is Friday.) Regards, Richard Schuh

Xedit reserved line with unprotected field

2010-08-06 Thread Les Koehler
Do I recall correctly that in order to use an unprotected field in a reserved line, the macro has to issue a READ ALL so that Xedit will honor the control characters? I've been playing with trying to do something like that with THE on my pc and just wanted to refresh my memory about that trick

Re: BFS problem

2010-08-06 Thread Jim Bohnsack
Michael---All the POSIXGROUP statements that you listed are there as you listed them. The USER id's that you listed are there, but some of them have POSIXINFO statements with a different UID number. USER DAEMON has UID 1 rather than UID 2 USER ADM had UID 4 rather than UID 3 I don't remember

Re: (Fwd) Curiosity Question: System Security

2010-08-06 Thread Scott Rohling
>From what you're describing - you would have 2 RACF groups (ITEMP and ITMGR)..those groups are given access to the resources they need. If ITMGR needs access to things that ITEMP have access too -- then just add them to the ITMGR group.While you can have superior and subgroups, to my k

Re: (Fwd) Curiosity Question: System Security

2010-08-06 Thread McKown, John
RACF, at least on z/OS, does not allow a GROUP to be a member of a group.. A RACF group can only contain RACF userids. Eg: AG GROUP1 AG GROUP2 ADDUSER USER1 You can do a CONNECT of USER1 to GROUP1 and GROUP2. But you cannot do a CONNECT of GROUP2 to GROUP1. John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT

(Fwd) Curiosity Question: System Security

2010-08-06 Thread Billy Bingham
>From a colleague on the vse-l mailing list. Billy --- Forwarded message follows --- I only just this week discovered that the VSE BSM does not support group within group security. Meaning, if you have two security groups of users -- say, IT managers and IT employees -- and you try