On Thursday, 10/28/2010 at 12:24 EDT, Jim Bohnsack
wrote:
> I'm still struggling in my attempt to set up or correct something that
> I've screwed up in BFS and/or RACF to allow BFS to be able to support
> SSL on z/VM 5.4. I've been told by IBM I need to work thru the
> Controlling OpenExtensions
Where in Italy?
Regards,
Alyce
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Pamela Christina - lovely autumn day @Endicott
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 8:25 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Article: New MF in Italy, Linux
Mike,
Only to synchronize:
Did you run PUT2PROD after enable DIRMAINT?
__
Clovis
|>
| From: |
|>
>--
Attempting to bring up DIRMAINT on z/VM 5.4 for the first time and cannot
find the "WHERETO DATADVH" file (see below). Do I need to create this file
and if so, what is the format?
dirm rlddata
FPLDSR146E File "WHERETO DATADVH *" does
Hi,
I think PUT2PROD actually doesn't depend of what was serviced, if a
component is specified.
Example: when I make changes into SYSTEM NETID (MAINT.490), I use
"PUT2PROD CMS" to copy 490 to 190 and to regenerate the CMS segment.
Runs all the times, no need to run SERVICE...
It solves the proble
I got this problem last week and Googled just the error message,
DTCPRD3038E, and this is what I found:
Welcome Mr. George Henke [Not you?] [ IBM Sign in ]
z/VM
TCP/IP for z/VM
About TCP/IP
Library
FAQ
Downloads
Notify me
Contact TCP/IP
Related links
Resource Link
Resource
and when I asked IBM this is the response I got:
"Sorry you ran into this problem, but fortunately the solution is quite
easy. The service for TCP/IP hit parts that are stored in the byte file
system. In order for that code to be copied to production, the servers
need to be up and running.
Here is IBM's recommended workaround for the TCPIP problem in PUT2PROD
that bypasses BFS.
Comment out with a '-' in column 1 the BFS load (in tag :TCPBFS) in
5VMTCP40.CATALOG on 5VMTCP40 491 and your TCPIP processing in PUT2PROD
will finish normally.
Evidently the BFS load is done for LDAP.
I
I'm still struggling in my attempt to set up or correct something that
I've screwed up in BFS and/or RACF to allow BFS to be able to support
SSL on z/VM 5.4. I've been told by IBM I need to work thru the
Controlling OpenExtensions and BFS Security chapter in the RACF Security
Admin. Gde, ch 14
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:29:05 -0400 (EDT), Jim Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:28:00 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:50:56 -0400 (EDT), Jim Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> Is FWLC similar to FUBAR?
>>
>> I suspect it is more like ATTWB. >;-)
>
> Clue please...
It was t
One virtual machine per fisherman: On IBM, Linux, Mainframe and the cloud
Here's the article:
http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/10/21/one-virtual-machine-per-fisherman-on-ibm-linux-mainframe-and-the-cloud/
This article delights me for several reasons --- something Italian,
new mainframe, and
Clue please...
Jim Hughes
603-271-5586
"It is fun to do the impossible."
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Stephen Powell
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:50:56 -0400 (EDT), Jim Hughes wrote:
>
> Is FWLC similar to FUBAR?
I suspect it is more like ATTWB. >;-)
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
Is FWLC similar to FUBAR?
_
Jim Hughes
x5586
"It is fun to do the impossible." Quote from Walt Disney
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Alan Altmark
Sent: Wed 10/27/2010 6:44 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: High Lev
14 matches
Mail list logo
