Re: VSE-L ListServ dead?

2011-06-30 Thread Billy R. Bingham
Frank, I've been seeing your posts and there have been a lot of posts about Bennie. Also several about CICS/VSE on z/VSE 4.3. Google groups for me shows the last post on June 26. Billy On 29 Jun 2011 at 8:48, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: There hasnĀ“t been any postings on the VSE-L

EDEVICE Question

2011-06-30 Thread John Hanley
Hello, When setting up EDEVs, is it preferable to use a unique FCP subchannel per EDEV or to use a single FCP subchannel for multiple EDEVs? I multi path each EDEV across all my FCP CHPIDS and they are used in a single LPAR, so I'm not sure it matters? Thanks. John Hanley

Re: EDEVICE Question

2011-06-30 Thread Daniel Bewley
Hi John, I can't speak as to what's absolutely best, but I can tell you that in our environment we use a single set of multipathed FCP subchannels with access to multiple LUNs for our EDEVs. The EDEVs are then shared between 60 or so guests per LPAR without any issue. -Daniel Bewley On Thu,

Re: EDEVICE Question

2011-06-30 Thread John Hanley
Thanks Daniel. That's kinda what I thought. And these are not even NPIV'ed (just 1 LPAR). John Hanley (804) 786-7823 Daniel Bewley ---06/30/2011 10:12:51 AM---Daniel Bewley daniel.bew...@gmail.com Daniel Bewley daniel.bew...@gmail.com Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System

Re: EDEVICE Question

2011-06-30 Thread Richard Troth
For scalability, no. In fact, since the I/O is per channel and not per subchannel, you gain little from spearding EDEVs across subchannels. At one point early in a prior life, I tried pinning each EDEV on its own pair of FCP subchans. Was a pain! -- R; Velocity Software